Laserfiche WebLink
Geolog1w-r "icsInc. Page 7 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 724 2 <br /> Apn1 25,2006 <br /> premise that the data we considered, although incomplete, are representative of actual site <br /> conditions We acknowledge that there may be undiscovered conditions, which would upon <br /> their consideration, change our interpretation and thus our conclusions <br /> Our recommendations are based on our knowledge of site conditions, and on the state and <br /> ' limitations of subsurface investigative technology <br /> Conclusions <br /> • The groundwater plume does not display a typical "core" but exhibits wide variations <br /> in contaminant concentration in both vertical and lateral planes as shown in Figures 6 <br /> - 12 Generally the plume has migrated down gradient of the source and is displaced <br /> east of the former UST <br /> o The highest MTBE concentrations detected in the intermediate and deep aquifers <br /> were in wells MW-1.06 (17 3 µg/1) and MW-209 (4 4g/1), respectively <br /> ' o Water table well MW-7 contains trace (0 7 ug/L) MTBE <br /> o The contaminated shallow, intermediate and deep wells are down gradient from <br /> the former UST and dispenser locations areas in the predominant groundwater <br /> direction to the east <br /> o The highest TPH-G concentrations were detected to the east of the site in wells <br /> MW-108 and MW--208 <br /> o None of the wells contained benzene above the laboratory reporting limit <br /> o In their correspondence dated September 3, 2002, the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) identified two LUFF sites (701 E <br /> Charter Way and 749 E Charter Way) as being up gradient of the subject site The <br /> contamination detected in the MW-1081208 location may be partly or entirely <br /> ' originated from an offsite source <br /> • The SJC/EHD also stated in their above letter that a sandy interval at 70 — 80 bgs <br /> could be acting as lateral conduit for contaminant migration The presence of <br /> contamination in deep wells MW-208 and MW-209 support this theory However, <br /> GTI still suggests that the low concentrations of TPH-G & MTBE in these wells do <br /> not warrant an engineered clean up <br /> ' • The data shows that a relatively stable, wide spread, low concentration plume of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon compounds is present in the groundwater at this site <br /> • The groundwater plume was further defined by the advancement of four Cone <br /> Penetrometer Testing (CPT) boreholes in January 2006 The CPT borings revealed <br /> that a local high of TPH-G is located in the vicinity of MW-208 The samples from <br /> the two locations down gradient (east) of wells MW-109/209 and MW-110/210 did <br /> ' not contain TPH-G above the laboratory reporting limits The presence of elevated <br /> levels of TPH-G along the edge of Charter Way (1580 ug/l MW-208) but not in the <br /> off site area due east of the former UST system supports the conclusion that the <br /> ' groundwater plume near MW-811081208 is being sourced by the contaminated sites to <br /> the northwest of the Morita parcel A review of the 4t` quarter 2005 data (Geotracker <br /> — State database) indicated that monitoring well MW-1 at the 749 E Charter Way <br /> 1 <br />