Laserfiche WebLink
Geological Technics ltm Page 6 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br />' Project No 724 2 <br /> April 25,2006 <br /> • Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of TPH-G in the intermediate wells A localized <br /> high is centered in well MW-108 that extends to the southwest toward MW-106 The <br /> concentrations attenuate laterally to the west, southwest and southeast <br /> • Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of TPH-G in the deep wells A localized high is <br /> centered in well MW-208 and the concentrations attenuate laterally to the locations of <br /> wells MW-202, MW-209 and MW-210 <br /> 2 MTBE <br /> • Figure 8 illustrates the distribution of MTBE in the shallow (water table) wells <br /> ' Contours were not produced for the drawing because only well MW-7 contained <br /> MTBE (0 7 ug/l,dust above the laboratory reporting limit of 0 5 ug/L) <br /> • Figure 9 illustrates the distribution of MTBE in the intermediate wells A localized <br /> ' high of 17 3 [.g/1 is present in well MW-106 that attenuates west and east locations of <br /> MW-107 and MW-109, respectively <br /> • Figure 10 illustrates the distribution of MTBE in the deep wells A node of MTBE (4 <br /> µg/l) is present in well MW-209 that attenuates to the west, northwest and southwest <br /> locations of MW-202, MW-208 and MW-210 <br /> 3 Benzene <br /> • None of the shallow wells contained Benzene above the laboratory reporting limits <br /> and therefore a contour diagram was not produced <br /> • Figure 11 illustrates the distribution of Benzene in the intermediate wells Contours <br /> were not produced for the drawing because none of the wells contained Benzene <br /> above the laboratory reporting limit of 0 5 ug/L <br /> ' o Figure 12 illustrates the distribution of Benzene in the deep wells Contours were not <br /> produced for the drawing because none of the wells contained Benzene above the <br /> laboratory reporting hmut of 0 5 ug/L <br /> Oxidation/Reduction Potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements (Table 6) <br /> show that 17 wells have low to highly negative ORP values and low DO readings The <br /> negative ORP values observed in the wells show that they are either within the core of the <br /> contamination plume or are in the reaction/depletion zone down gradient of the plume <br /> Dissolved oxygen values generally corroborate with the ORP values measured in these wells <br /> ' and suggest that the plume is relatively stable <br /> As indicated in Figure 13 —MW-2 TPH-G vs GW Elevation, with the exception of June 20, <br /> ' 1997, contaminant concentrations have generally mimicked the pattern of groundwater <br /> elevation changes for the past 10 years in down gradient well MW-2 <br /> 1 <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on our interpretation of the data collected over the course of this subsurface <br /> investigation, GTI has reached several conclusions These conclusions are based on the <br />