Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 04 September 2007 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0121 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> remediation of other hydrocarbon phases. <br /> High-vacuum (vacuum pump capable ofproducing25 to 30 inches ofinercury) dual-phase extraction <br /> systems are capable of removing both hydrocarbon vapors and, depending on-site soil type, <br /> stratification, liquid and dissolved phase hydrocarbons. Extracted vapors are to be treated by <br /> incineration in catalytic oxidation and waste (impacted) ground water be stored on site in a <br /> temporary tank for later recycling and disposal. The advantages and disadvantages of DPE are <br /> discussed below. <br /> Advantages: High vacuum dual phase extraction using thermal/catalytic oxidation can <br /> quickly remediate petroleum hydrocarbons present in the vadose zone, <br /> capillary fringe and upper portion of the saturated zone. Due to the burial of <br /> the significant adsorbed contamination (Appendix D), the dual phase system <br /> can often be more effective than other options (air-sparging and soil vapor <br /> extraction). <br /> Disadvantages: The effectiveness of this technology is sometimes dependent upon <br /> sufficiently lowering the water table to allow vapor extraction to remove <br /> hydrocarbons from the capillary fringe and saturated zones. <br /> Discussion: Based on this review of site conditions (depth of impacted soil and high water <br /> table over the impacted soil, with a significant dissolved phase concentration <br /> of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)/Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and <br /> total xylenes (BTEJ ), high vacuum dual phase extraction is considered the <br /> a viable option for this site, especially based on the drawdown observed in <br /> the extraction well during purging. The capability of remediating the three <br /> phases of hydrocarbons and treating the vadose, capillary fringe and upper <br /> saturated zones within a rapid time frame are particularly well suited to the <br /> existing conditions and requirements. <br /> 2.4. PREPARATION OF REPORT OF FINDINGS <br /> Results of the well installations and DPE pilot study results will be presented in a report of findings. <br /> The report will be in a format acceptable to the CRWQCB (Appendix A Guidelines), and will be <br /> reviewed and signed by a California Professional Geologist. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br />