Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> W } <br /> • 30 July 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0121 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> I The ground water elevation data obtained during this monitoring event from the ground water <br /> monitoring wells are depicted on Figure 3 The inferred ground water flow direction, from within <br /> the lower sand,level(confined)of the aquifer,for the area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-9 was <br /> inferred to have a net groundwater"flow towards the north-northwest at a gradient of 0 004 ft/ft or <br /> less, or approximately 21 feet per mile (Figure 3) <br /> I3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in eight ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 through MW-4, <br /> MW-7,VW-2,VW-4 and VW-6 at concentrations as high as 32,000 micrograms per liter(gg/1)from <br /> MW-1 (Figure 4) TPH-d was detected in six ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-4,MW-7 and VW-4 at concentrations as high as 32,000µg/1 from VW-1,however the <br /> laboratory reported the sample chromatograms to be more representative of gasoline <br /> I <br /> Various benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) constituents were detected in eight <br /> ground water sample collected from wells MW-1 through MW-4,MW-7,VW-2,VW,-4 and VW-6 <br /> at concentrations as high as 15,000 41 benzene firorn well MW-2 <br /> MTBE was detected in the water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and VW-4 at <br /> concentrations as high as 290 gg/1 from well MW-1, DIPE was detected in the water sample <br /> collected from well MW-1 at a concentration of 5 }tg/l, 1,2-DCA was detected in the water sample <br /> collected from well VW-4 at a concentration of 55 pg/1 No other fuel components were detected <br /> Iduring the laboratory analysis s <br /> Previous and current analytical results of ground water monitoring well samples are summarized In <br /> Tables 3 and 4 The laboratory reports(Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories Sample I D 0312-190) <br /> and chain of custody forms are presented in Appendix C GeoTracker confirmation pages of the <br /> submitted laboratory electromc deliverable format (EDF) files are Included to Appendix D <br /> I <br /> 4.0. - SUMMARY AND-CONCLUSIONS <br /> The Implications from Fourth Quarter 2003 ground water`monitoring events are as follows <br /> Y <br /> • The net groundwater flow direction for the area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-9 was ` <br /> Inferred to be towards the north-northwest at a gradient of 0 004 ft/ft or less (Figure 3) The <br /> flow dtrectton may not represent the uppermost water table flow direction <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> , w Y <br />