My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1045
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544231
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 4:10:14 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 1:59:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001094
RECORD_ID
PR0544231
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023968
FACILITY_NAME
NOMELLINI CONSTRUCTION CO
STREET_NUMBER
1045
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323040
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1045 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30 July 2004 <br /> j <br /> i AGE-NC Project No 95-0121 r <br /> 1, <br /> =Page 3 of 6 . _ - <br /> j , <br /> , I _ <br /> 2 3 GROUND WATER SAMPLING - T <br /> Following well purging , ground water Ievels,at wells MW-1 through MW-9 and VW-2 achieved " <br /> a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior to sample collection,well VW-1 was not sampled due to <br /> detection of floating petroleum product, wells VW-3 through VW-7 did not achieve 80%recharge <br /> due to being purged `dry' Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing the <br /> I dedicated, disposable bailers and transferred into 1-liter amber bottles without sample preservative <br /> and'40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5-ml 18%hydrochloric <br /> acid as a sample preservative Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in <br /> the vials after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well <br /> designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> 2 4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> IFollowing collection and labeling,each ground water sample was logged on a chain of custody form, <br /> placed in a chilled container and transported to Ca1,Tech Environmental Laboratories, a California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis for ` <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons ,quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) by EPA Methods 8015M, and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX), methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE), di- <br /> isopropyl ether (D1PE), ethyl tert butyl;ether (ETBE), tert amyl methyl ether (TAME), <br /> tertiary butanol (TBA), ethylene dibromide (EDB) and,1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) by <br /> EPA Method 8260B + <br /> 1 , <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> e <br /> Ground water elevation,flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on 22 <br /> December 2003 The contaminant impact to,ground water was quantified by the ground water <br /> Ilaboratory data"collected on 23 December 2003 r <br /> 1 <br /> r , <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water in wells MWA through MW-9 and VW-1 through VW-7 were measured <br /> Iat between I7 30 and 19 21 feet below the tops of well casings The ground water elevations were <br /> calculated to be between 10 32 feet (VW-7) and 12 35 feet (MW-8) below mean sea level (MSL) <br /> « , <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.