Laserfiche WebLink
S+ <br /> 1 07 October 2403 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0121 <br />' Page 5 of 7 <br /> • On two separate occasions, approximately 0 9 feet and 0 49 feet of floating petroleum <br />' product was encountered at soil vapor extraction well VW-1, approximately 4 gallons of <br /> ground water was hand-bailed from the well during each incident until the petroleum product <br />' was no longer observed and no longer detected utilizing a Solinst Interface Probe Well <br /> VW-1 has a screen interval between 15 and 30 feet bsg, which is screened across the lower <br /> sand of the site aquifer, thus demonstrating the release of adsorbed hydrocarbons from the <br />' fine grained soils at approximately twenty to twenty-five feet, into the lower sand <br /> • Free product was not detected in any other vapor wells(screened 5 to 20 feet bsg),which are <br /> exclusively screened across the upper sand unit at the site, most likely demonstrating the <br />' success of the operation of the soil vapor extraction system <br /> • The core of-the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume appears to be located at depths <br />' between 25 feet and 53 feet bsg in the area of deeper screened wells MW-1 through MW-4, <br /> MW-7 (Figure 5) and more apparent at the top of the water table at,depths between 17 feet <br /> and 20 feet bsg 1n vapor wells VW-1 and to a lesser in vapor well VW-4 and VW-6 <br /> (Figure 4) A review of current and previous ground water samples suggest the core of the <br /> plume is impacted by TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, MTBE (Table 3) The detection of 1,2-DCA <br /> • in the shallow water table suggests that the deeper wells may also be impacted with 1,2-DCA <br /> due to the sinking nature of this compound The 1,2-DCA compound will need to be fully <br /> assessed and mitigated prior to closure <br /> IThe lateral and vertical extent of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons is not fully defined at the <br /> site, further assessment is warranted west-northwest of well MW-7, north of MW-2 and <br /> north-east of well MW-4 (Figures 4 and 5) <br /> „ <br /> In Corrective Action Plan - November 1995, dated 14 November 1995, AGE recommended <br /> implementation of soil vapor extraction in conjunction with in-situ air sparging for remediation of <br /> the petroleum hydrocarbon,Impacted soil and ground water at the site At the time the CAP was F <br /> prepared, other dissolved'petroleum treatment methods (i e ground water pump-and-treat, ozone <br /> I spargmg,air stripping)were generally not,viewed as an effective and cost efficient method of ground <br /> water remediation However, the above methods have gained more favor recently as methods to <br /> address hydrocarbon-impacted ground water due impart to improved engineering,reduced treatment <br /> costs and reduced disposal costs, where as previous technologies (air-sparging) may not be as <br /> controllable,or as effective <br /> ISince the approval ofthe'CAP in December 1995,the local and regional ground water elevation has <br /> increased significantly(approximately 10 feet) and has maintained a depth to water of near 15 feet <br /> bsg The CAP was properly designed to mitigate dissolved and adsorbed shallow contamination, <br /> with a water table level at approximately 25 to 30 feet bsg AGE believes that the sustained increase <br /> of ground water elevation has significantly decreased the potential effectiveness of SVEAAS as a <br /> S <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, [nc <br />