My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001118
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1045
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544231
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 5:30:57 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 2:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001118
RECORD_ID
PR0544231
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023968
FACILITY_NAME
NOMELLINI CONSTRUCTION CO
STREET_NUMBER
1045
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323040
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1045 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I 1 ^ x <br /> 4 <br /> , 12 March 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 95-0121 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> each SVE/IAS well head to control vacuum and compressed air flow A utility sand was utilized to <br />' backfill the IAS and SVE pipe system in the trench to 6 inches bsg,the remaiiung void trench space <br /> was backfilled with stockpiled soil generated from trenching activities The SVE/IAS,piping system <br /> is depicted in Figure 5 <br />' 2 3 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> Depths to ground water were measured from the top of each well casing at the site to the nearest 0 01 <br />' foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter Ground water elevations in each well at the site were <br /> calculated by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from surveyed casing elevations <br /> (Table 1) Ground water elevations were plotted and contoured on a scaled site map (Figure 6) <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately twelve to sixteen gallons of ground water (a <br /> minimum of three well volumes per well) were removed (purged) from wells MW-1 through MW-9 <br />' utilizing a two-stage submersible pump, the first two gallons were removed utilizing a teflon bailer <br />} and new rope Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured for stabilization at regular purge <br /> volume intervals from each well using an ICM Model 52200 water analyzer Field data and logs are <br /> included with Appendix D Purged ground water was containerized in 55-gallon drums and was <br /> stored on-site in an area lacking general public access <br /> 2 3 1 Ground Water Sampling <br /> Prior to sampling wells MW-1 through MW-9, ground water levels achieved a minimum of 80 <br /> percent recharge Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing new, <br /> disposable polyethylene bailers, and were transferred into one-liter amber bottles and four 40-m1 <br /> EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative Care <br /> was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping <br />' Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's <br /> initials <br /> 2 3 2 Laboratory Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> 1 Each ground water sample was}logged on achain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to Castle Analytical Laboratory and McCampbell Analytical Inc ,California Department <br /> ' of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratories for analysis in accordance with <br /> • EPA Method 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel <br /> AdvancedGeoEmironmental,Inc <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.