Laserfiche WebLink
N Page 1 of 4 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Adrienne Ellsaesser[EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:29 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 4th Quarter Non-GWM Status <br /> Vicki <br /> I have no idea on how to do a deed restriction. It may need to go through County Counsel. I have no <br /> response for him. <br /> Currently CDD and EHD land Use staff review Geotracker and our list of contaminated sites before they <br /> allow any changes. <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:50 PM <br /> To: Adrienne Ellsaesser [EH] <br /> Cc: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: 4th Quarter Non-GWM Status <br /> Adrienne, <br /> I need to respond to the email below from Jenny Weese of Geological Technics Inc. (GTI). Jenny would <br /> like to know the reason San Joaquin County will not issue a land use restriction as a condition of site <br /> closure. Also, Jenny asks what role San Joaquin County would have in the future to have this policy <br /> since this is a property owner restriction. Please respond when it is convenient. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartnev(@sicehd.com <br /> ,_s. <br /> j� <br /> [OM„ <br /> From: Jenny Weese [mailto:JennyW(@citienv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 1:13 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 4th Quarter Non-GWM Status <br /> Ok—just curious, if I am asked,what is the reason and since it is a property owner restriction,what role <br /> would the county have down the road to have this policy? <br /> Jenny Weese <br /> Chief of Operations <br /> 2/12/2013 <br />