Laserfiche WebLink
Gealogica[TeChAtcsInc Page 2 <br /> ' 2nd Quarter 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> . October 15, 2002 <br /> ' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br /> The geology of the site is predominately clays and sandy clays with lesser amounts of silts <br /> and sands The average groundwater elevation was 10 11 feet below msl on June 20, 2002 <br /> This represents a decrease of 0 76 feet since the February 2002, monitoring event A <br /> groundwater gradient was calculated for the event and found to be flowing N7$°E at 0 002 <br /> ft/ft <br /> ' The gradient direction for the June 20 monitoring event is shown in Figure 2, and the <br /> historical groundwater directions and gradients are shown in Figure 3, Groundwater <br /> Gradient Rose Diagram The groundwater elevation data are summarized in Table 1, <br /> Appendix A Table 5 provides a summary of monitoring well construction <br /> The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater has vaned <br /> ' during the course of the investigation As evident in Figure 3, groundwater exhibited a <br /> strong bifurcated flow regime in 2000, trending predominantly to the southwest or north- <br /> northeast at approximately 180-degree direction reversal With the installation of wells <br /> MW-7 and MW-10 in May 2001, the direction had been to the east-northeast in five of six <br /> events The site is quite close to the San Joaquin River and tidal fluctuations may contribute <br /> to some of the observed changes in groundwater direction <br /> Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br />' Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a <br /> function of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As <br /> with horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial <br />' The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br /> • Determine the vertical distance between the two measuring devices by the distance from <br /> I the mid-point between the top and bottom seal of the deep well (MW-109) and the mid- <br /> point between the groundwater elevation and the bottom seal in the shallow well (MW- <br /> 9) _ <br /> • Measure the head in both wells used in the calculations <br /> 0 If the lateral distance between the well pair is greater than a few feet, then calculations <br /> must be made to correct the down-gradient piezoinetric head to account for the sloping <br /> water table between the wells The calculation considers the slope of the water table and <br /> the distance in a down-gradient direction between the two wells used in the calculations <br /> rFigure 2 shows the location of the well cluster used for calculating the vertical groundwater <br /> gradient in this report, MW-9 and MW-109 Table 1 shows Summary of Water Level and <br /> Gradients Slope and Bearing, and Table 2 shows the calculated vertical gradients The <br /> information used in the calculations is shown below <br /> r <br />