Laserfiche WebLink
CeofogicafTechnecs 2ne Page 2 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> March 12, 2001 <br /> A groundwater gradient was calculated for the event and found to be flowing N36°E at <br /> 0 003 ft/ft Gradient direction for the January 2001 monitoring event is shown in Figure 2, <br /> and the historical groundwater directions and gradients are shown in Figure 3, Groundwater <br /> Gradient Rose Diagram The groundwater elevation data are summarized in Table 1, <br /> Appendix A <br /> The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater has varied <br /> during the course of the investigation As evident in Figure 3, groundwater has a strong <br /> bifurcated flow regime, trending predominantly to the southwest or northeast at <br /> approximate 180-degree direction reversal The site is quite close to the San Joaquin River <br /> and tidal fluctuations might be responsible for the observed changes in groundwater <br /> direction <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On January 5, 2001, Don Light of Del-Tech mobilized to the site to conduct groundwater <br /> monitoring of the eight existing monitoring wells <br /> Before sampling was attempted the wells were sounded for depth to water and then a clear <br /> disposable bailer was used to determine if floating product was present The wells were <br /> purged of at least three well volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra check-ball <br /> assembly and %2 inch tubing Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH <br /> of the groundwater stabilized (C10% variation between three readings), indicating that <br /> formation water representative of aquifer conditions was entering the wells These water <br /> quality parameteis were measured at intervals of each well volume purged <br />' Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation Once the sample container was filled and capped, the <br /> bottle was inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles The sample container was <br /> identified and Iabeled with a unique designation, inserted into a foam holder and placed in <br /> an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a hot water washer and <br /> detergent before and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to <br /> collect all samples and were changed with each sample collection <br />' Ac <br /> pain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and insure their <br /> integrity <br /> • <br /> i <br />