My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001030
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1245
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544236
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 8:34:05 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 4:12:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001030
RECORD_ID
PR0544236
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024238
FACILITY_NAME
JM EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323034
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CeofogicafTechnecs 2ne Page 2 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> March 12, 2001 <br /> A groundwater gradient was calculated for the event and found to be flowing N36°E at <br /> 0 003 ft/ft Gradient direction for the January 2001 monitoring event is shown in Figure 2, <br /> and the historical groundwater directions and gradients are shown in Figure 3, Groundwater <br /> Gradient Rose Diagram The groundwater elevation data are summarized in Table 1, <br /> Appendix A <br /> The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater has varied <br /> during the course of the investigation As evident in Figure 3, groundwater has a strong <br /> bifurcated flow regime, trending predominantly to the southwest or northeast at <br /> approximate 180-degree direction reversal The site is quite close to the San Joaquin River <br /> and tidal fluctuations might be responsible for the observed changes in groundwater <br /> direction <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On January 5, 2001, Don Light of Del-Tech mobilized to the site to conduct groundwater <br /> monitoring of the eight existing monitoring wells <br /> Before sampling was attempted the wells were sounded for depth to water and then a clear <br /> disposable bailer was used to determine if floating product was present The wells were <br /> purged of at least three well volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra check-ball <br /> assembly and %2 inch tubing Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH <br /> of the groundwater stabilized (C10% variation between three readings), indicating that <br /> formation water representative of aquifer conditions was entering the wells These water <br /> quality parameteis were measured at intervals of each well volume purged <br />' Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation Once the sample container was filled and capped, the <br /> bottle was inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles The sample container was <br /> identified and Iabeled with a unique designation, inserted into a foam holder and placed in <br /> an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a hot water washer and <br /> detergent before and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to <br /> collect all samples and were changed with each sample collection <br />' Ac <br /> pain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and insure their <br /> integrity <br /> • <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.