Laserfiche WebLink
' Geologrca(Technrrs Inc Page 4 <br /> Soil 11Groundwater Investigation Report <br />' J M Equipment <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> June 9, 1999 <br /> surface seal was achieved by pumping a neat cement grout (augmented with <4% bentonite) <br /> on top of the transition seal The wells were secured with locking watertight caps encased in <br /> flush mounted traffic rated well boxes <br />' On April 14, 1999, Don Light of Del Tech mobilized to the site to develop the new <br /> monitoring wells (using mechanical surging and pumping methods) until a clear stream of <br />' water was obtained On April 16, 1999, Don Light returned to the site to purge and collect <br /> groundwater samples from the three new monitoring wells and four of the wells previously <br /> installed by independent trucking All development and purge water was containerized in 55- <br /> gallon DOT approved containers and stored on site until its disposition can be arranged <br /> 2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> The groundwater in the new well was sampled no sooner than 24 hours after well <br /> I development The following was the procedure for the sampling of groundwater from the <br /> well <br /> Before sampling was attempted the well was sounded for depth to water The wells were <br /> then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a centrifugal pump and a <br /> Waterra purging tube Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH of the <br /> groundwater has stabilized (<10% variation between three readings) indicating that formation <br />' water representative of aquifer conditions was entering the well These water quality <br /> parameters were measured at intervals of each well volume purged <br /> The dedicated Waterra purging tube was used to collect a sample from each well Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the transfer of the <br /> sample to the VOA vial and glass amber liter bottles Once the sample container was filled <br /> and capped, the bottle was then inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles The <br /> sample container was then identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into <br /> foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before <br /> and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and <br /> were changed after each sample was collected <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and insure their <br /> I integrity <br /> All water purged from each monitoring well was placed in a 55 gallon DOT approved <br /> container, properly labeled and stored on site - <br /> I2.2 2 Groundwater Sample Analyses <br /> One groundwater sample from each well was submitted to BSK Laboratories of Fresno (State <br /> I Certified Laboratory #1180) and analyzed for <br /> • benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 602 <br /> • oxygenated fuel compounds (MTBE, DIPS, ETBE, TAME, TBA by EPA method 8260 <br /> • gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) by EPA method 8015(m) <br /> The detection Iimits for these compounds are listed below A Chain of Custody was <br /> completed for all samples collected and tracked to ensure sample integrity <br />