Laserfiche WebLink
JM Equipment <br /> Chemical Oxidation Test Report <br /> ' influence of about two feet However, there is some indication that the ORP at four feet from the <br /> injection well had a posit7we trend, indicating the oxidant may have migrating to that point <br /> ' Total Hydrocarbon % Reduction versus Oxidant Injected <br /> JM Equipment <br /> Chemical Oxidation Test(March-June 2004) <br /> 80 ------ <br /> 60 <br /> 40 _ --- — - <br /> 1 ,2 <br /> 0 <br /> I V 20 40 50 60 <br /> o -20 - - — --- <br /> -40 -- Wel I Average <br /> -ea—MW-9 i <br /> 1 -60 --GP-1 - - ----- <br /> w GP-2 <br /> GP-3 <br /> -80 <br /> LB. Oxident <br />' FIgure 4: <br />' 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Test results indicate that hydrocarbon mass destruction was conducted at the site by chemical <br />' oxidation reactions Due to the clay existing onsite, a large mass of hydrocarbons are adsorbed <br /> Applied Process Te(.hnology, Inc Confidential lntonnation <br /> 09/20/04 <br /> APT So-019 www 40LVntei com Page 9 of 11 <br /> 1 <br />