Laserfiche WebLink
r4eologlul reelm"W Page 9 <br /> In Situ Remediation <br /> Pilot Test Work Plan <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> June 10, 2003 <br /> The screened intervals of the wells are designed to intercept the infected chemicals from the <br />' ,screened interval of monitoring well MW-9 noted above [screened 15 — 35 feet below grade <br /> surface (bgs)] <br />' 3.4 Infection Process <br /> Well MW-9 will be infected with a dilute hydrogen peroxide solution The actual peroxide <br />' concentration utilized will be determined after GTI and APT staff review the pre-test <br /> chemical data described above The infection equipment will consist of fluid tanks, a <br />' compressor, pressure hoses and miscellaneous cap fittings After the peroxide is introduced <br /> it will be forced into the forination with pressurized air <br /> The injections will be made in "pulse" mode After the casing is filled with the infection <br />' solution, pressure is applied to help force the solution out into the formation The infection <br /> process will be temporarily halted to allow the material to percolate into the formation <br />' When the MW-9 casing fluid returns to static level (as monitored by pressure drop), the <br /> infection will continue Due to the tight nature of the soils this may be a time consuming <br /> process The actual volume added to MW-9 may vary based on effective porosity of the <br /> soil, soil moisture and depth to groundwater <br /> If subsequent monitoring warrants, then additional infections of hydrogen peroxide will take <br />' place The injections are expected to take place bi-monthly based on existing site <br /> conditions The injections may be augmented with nutrients (nitrates/phosphates) to <br /> stimulate bio-degradation, and may also include chasing the hydrogen peroxide with <br /> oxygen or ozone to provide additional oxygen for bio-degradation and more hydroxyl <br /> radicals, respectively The decisions to use these chemicals and modifications to the bi- <br /> monthly injection schedule will be made in conjunction with APT staff during the <br />' effectiveness testing process outlined below <br />' 4.0 EFFECTIVENESS TESTING <br /> Groundwater samples will be obtained from the monitoring wells GP-1 through GP-3 on a <br /> regular schedule to determine the effectiveness of the infection process The first <br /> monitoring event will take place one week after the initial peroxide infection Subsequent <br />' monitoring will take place on a bi-weekly basis Dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxidation- <br /> reduction potential (ORP) will be measured in the three observation wells plus MW-9 and <br /> the data used as an indication that the chemical reactions are spreading beyond the point of <br />' infection This is not expected to be a rapid process as silty/clayey soils are predominant at <br /> the site and the low permeability of these soils will result in slow chemical diffusion Once <br /> the chemical reactions are confirmed to be taking place, the amounts, frequency and <br /> composition of the infections can be altered to maximize process efficiency <br />