My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012489
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1245
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544236
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012489
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 7:12:15 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 4:24:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012489
RECORD_ID
PR0544236
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024238
FACILITY_NAME
JM EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323034
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' eo(o ica Tecfmus Inc Page 2 <br /> � 6 g <br /> Groundwater Momtormg Repo,t <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> June 19, 2001 <br /> iThe Oxidation-Reduction Potential measurements show that all eleven of the monitoring <br /> wells are within the halo of reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the <br /> Contamination plume <br /> 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br /> ' The geology of the site is predominately clays and sandy clays with lesser amounts of silts <br /> and sands The average groundwater elevation was —7 61 feet below MSL on June 1, 2001 <br /> ' MSL is approximately 7 37 feet below ground sui face <br /> A groundwater gradient was calculated for the event and found to be flowing N77°E at <br /> 0 002 ft/ft Gradient direction for the June 2001 monitoring event is shown in Figure 2, and <br /> the historical groundwater directions and gradients are shown in Figure 3, Groundwater <br /> Gradient Rose Diagram The groundwater elevation data are summarized in Table 1, <br /> ' Appendix A <br /> The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater has varied <br /> during the course of the investigation As evident in Figure 3, groundwater has a strong <br /> bifurcated flow regnne, trending predominantly to the southwest or northeast at <br /> approximate 180-degree direction reversal The site is quite close to the San Joaquin River <br /> and tidal fluctuations might be responsible for the observed changes in groundwater <br /> direction <br /> ' Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a <br /> ' function of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As <br /> with horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial <br /> ' The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br /> 9 Detennme vertical distance between the two measuring devices by the distance from the <br /> mid-point between the top and bottom seal of the deep well (MW-109) and the mid- <br /> point between the groundwater elevation and the bottom seal in the shallow well (MW- <br /> 9) <br /> a Measure the head in both wells used in the calculations <br /> • If the lateral distance between the well pair is greater than a few feet, then calculations <br /> must be made to correct the down-gradient piezometric head to account for the sloping <br /> ' water table between the wells The calculation considers the slope of the water table and <br /> the distance in a down-gradient direction between the two wells used in the calculations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.