Laserfiche WebLink
of the inspection, there were no conditions which would impact on the ability of the tank to <br /> maintain its integrity, nor any visible evidence that the small underlying issues presented any <br /> articulable danger of increasing in severity or in scope. Both tanks A & B, having been well <br /> maintained and that the seal-paint of the overall tank has been effecfibe in preventing any <br /> substantial issues in addition to maintaining the overall integrity of the exterior steel shell, that <br /> the overall condition of the shells on both tanks has been quite good. <br /> There appear to be no issues with any of the tanks' primary vessels, as no signs beyond minor <br /> corrosion are present. Any maintenance indicated in this section should be scheduled for this <br /> coming year when weather conditions allow. <br /> Tank Equipment <br /> Piping: <br /> These two tanks are manifolded together with a 3-inch overhead pipe which allows for filling <br /> both tanks from a single Baker Box connection. Per the inspection report from San Joaquin <br /> County,dated March 14, 2019,there was concern that"permanent manifolding"of the tanks <br /> would have an impact on the secondary containment provisions, (67 CFR 47122, July 17,2002). <br /> An inquiry to this specific concern was made to US EPA in Region 9, San Francisco. The US <br /> EPA, individual, in charge of AboveGround Storage Tank regulations contacted Washington <br /> D.C. EPA for further clarification. The response from US EPA in Washington.D. C. <br /> Headquarters was as follows: the type of configuration in question would NOT be considered <br /> as permanently manifolded together. Here is the rationale: The piping, extending over the <br /> tops of the tanks would prevent one tank draining out the other tank if it failed, or visa versa. <br /> Put another way, if one tank were to split open, it would not cause the other tank to split open <br /> or drain out. So, they can be considered separate and distinct tanks. <br /> During the inspection of the ASTs and piping, it was - <br /> noticed that there was a substantial amount of surface , <br /> corrosion on the overhead piping. A closer inspection <br /> indicated that the corrosion was only surface corrosion, not ; . <br /> affecting the integrity of the steel pipes. It was ,S <br /> recommended that's the pipes should immediately have the <br /> corrosion removed and the pipes repainted. <br /> Owner/Operator immediately undertook this task and the -, <br /> pipes were repaired and repainted. At the top rear of the <br /> tanks, there are electric pumps from which fuel is carried overhead on 2-inch pipes to the <br /> dispensers. These pipes are also manifolded <br /> with a junction to one pipe for supply and <br /> that one pipe carries product to the dispensers <br /> at the fueling island. The pipes were <br /> inspected and determined to be in good <br /> 4: operating condition, along with the pumps. <br />