My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006244
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1111
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544294
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2019 4:20:33 PM
Creation date
3/29/2019 4:14:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006244
RECORD_ID
PR0544294
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0007044
FACILITY_NAME
SAFEWAY MEAT PROCESSING PLANT
STREET_NUMBER
1111
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16326007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1111 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br />' Depth to water was measured in wells MW-4, MW-5 and MW-6 on April 30, 2002 prior <br /> to purging and sampling the first well Groundwater elevation measurements were <br /> made using a Solinst water level meter The water level measurement field data sheets <br /> are provided in Appendix A <br />' Mr Jeffrey Wong of the EHD was on-site for a portion of the fieldwork At Mr Wong's <br /> request, following the purging and sampling of the first well, depth to water was also <br /> measured in the next well sampled immediately prior to purging The purpose of this <br /> task was to assess if a response to drawdown could be measured in adjacent wells <br /> During this sampling event, MW-6, MW-5 and MW-4 were purged and sampled in that <br /> order Based on water level measurements collected from MW-5 immediately prior to <br /> purging, the depth to groundwater decreased by 0 03 feet after purging well MW-6 <br /> The water level in MW-4, purged and sampled last, did not change following purging <br /> and sampling at MW-6 and MW-5 <br /> Prior to collecting groundwater samples, each well was purged using a new disposable <br /> bailer At least three casing volumes were purged from the wells and temperature, pH, <br /> and electrical conductivity readings were recorded after each casing volume was <br /> • removed The readings were recorded on the field data sheets in Appendix A <br />' Between 40 and 60 gallons of water was removed from each well prior to sampling The <br /> water was clear in each well following purging <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from each well with the same bailer used for <br /> purging New disposable latex gloves were donned prior to sampling each well The <br /> three groundwater samples were placed in containers appropriate for the selected <br />' analyses, labeled and placed on ice in a thermally insulated cooler pending delivery to <br /> the laboratory The samples were hand delivered to CLS Laboratories in Rancho <br /> Cordova, California on May 1, 2002 and analyzed for diesel range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons {TPH-D} using EPA Method 8015M, preceded by silica gel cleanup The <br /> groundwater sample from MW-6 was also analyzed for total coliform using the 15-tube <br /> Standard Method 9221 <br /> i � <br /> i <br /> ' GeoTrans,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.