Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Mr . Kelly Williamson <br /> October 7, 1985 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 2. The discharge water cannot b discharged to a sewer or <br /> offsite storm drain system since none exist. There are <br /> two possible discharge soluti ns: <br /> a. Discharge to onsite storm drain pond. This will. <br /> work in summer but may not be sufficient during <br /> heavy rain periods. <br /> b. Recharge ground water depression area by discharge <br /> to recharge wells or trenches on site. <br /> Recommend cover all options : <br /> * Start up recovery sy tem and discharge to the <br /> storm drain pond between now and early winter <br /> when pond must be available for storm drain. <br /> * Apply now to install recharge wells or recharge <br /> trenches for use in winter months. Recharge <br /> should be accomplished near plume parameter . <br /> 3. The recovery well (24" screen casing) as drilled should <br /> be sufficient in size to accomplish the recovery. <br /> 4. Monitoring: <br /> a. Discharge Water: 602 Test weekly <br /> Influent Water: 602 Test monthly <br /> Discharge limit to be set by San Joaquin County. <br /> b. Keep log of water pumped and fuel recovered. <br /> c. Measure each monitor well weekly to verify plume <br /> depression. <br /> Data Source: <br /> 1. Fox Environmental Services Report, August 1, 1985 <br /> Typical Monitor Well <br /> Recovery Well Diagram <br /> 2. Fox Environmental Service Re ort, July 2, 1985 <br /> 3. IT Corp Report, March 14 , 1985 <br /> 4. IT Corp Report, April 18, 1965 <br /> 5. IT Corp Report, April 8, 198 <br /> 6. Twining Laboratories Report, July 16, 1985 <br />