My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010527
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
8125
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0528611
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 5:03:01 PM
Creation date
4/2/2019 5:00:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010527
RECORD_ID
PR0528611
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0019235
FACILITY_NAME
J & L MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
8125
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
19317003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8125 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> Two soil,borings were drilled in November 2001 to assess residual soil contamination <br /> and determine whether groundwater is contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons at 8125 <br /> South El Dorado Street in French Camp, California The site is the location of J & L <br /> Market, a gasoline service station, restaurant, and convenience store <br /> One boring was drilled to a depth of 35 feet, encountering groundwater between 30 and <br /> 35 feet Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals from 10 feet to total depth, and <br /> gasoline odor was detected in most of the samples A water sample was collected at 33 <br /> feet, but groundwater in the boring later rose to a depth of 27 5 feet The other boring was <br /> drilled to 30 feet, but only a small amount of groundwater was encountered The boring <br /> was then extended to 40 feet, and a more substantial groundwater zone was encountered <br /> between 35 and 40 feet Two soil samples and a water sample were collected from this <br /> boring No hydrocarbon odors were present in the soil samples, but an unidentified <br /> hydrocarbon odor was evident in the water sample <br /> Gasoline was detected between the depths of 10 and 25 feet from the boring nearest the <br /> station building (JLM-2) and in the water samples from both borings Diesel was also <br /> detected in the water sample from the boring near the dispensers (JLM-1) In the soil <br /> samples, TPH-g concentrations ranged from 32 to 1300 mg/kg (p'arts per million) and <br /> ethylbenzene and xylene concentrations ranged from 089 to 33 parts per million In the <br /> water samples, TPH-g concentrations of 460 and 2300 µg/l (parts per billion) were <br /> detected, diesel (TPH-d) was detected at 610 parts per billion, and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) were detected at concentrations ranging from 0 63 to <br /> 290 parts per billion No gasoline oxygenates were detected in any of the soil samples, <br /> but methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) was detected in the two water samples at 1 5 and <br /> 120 parts per billion and dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) was detected at 20 and 25 parts per <br /> billion <br /> Field observations and laboratory data confirm the results of the remedial investigation <br /> that was undertaken in 1995, when approximately 4,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil <br /> were excavated from the site and transported to a treatment facility When excavation <br /> was completed, residual soil contamination was detected near the station building but <br /> could not be removed without endangering the building Although boring JLM-2 was <br /> drilled as close to the station building as feasible, the lateral limit of contaminated soil <br /> was not reached No soil contamination was detected below a depth of 25 feet, which is <br /> the apparent vertical lima of contamination <br /> The data also confirm that groundwater has been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> Relatively low concentrations of several hydrocarbons were detected in the water, but the <br /> lateral limits of contaminated groundwater are unknown No specific data on the local <br /> groundwater flow direction are available, but the 1993 map "Lines of Equal Elevation of <br /> Water in Wells"prepared by the San Joaquin County Flood Control District indicates <br /> north to northeastward flow in the area <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.