My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Z
>
ZUCKERMAN
>
1181
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0505942
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2024 11:46:54 AM
Creation date
4/12/2019 10:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0505942
PE
2249
FACILITY_ID
FA0007096
FACILITY_NAME
PG&E: McDonald Island Compressor Station
STREET_NUMBER
1181
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ZUCKERMAN
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95206
APN
129-310-12
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1181 N Zuckerman Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\HW\HW_2249_PR0505942_1181 N ZUCKERMAN_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n <br />C <br />Oil Exploration and Production Wastes Initiative Project Methodolody <br />be involved in the regulation of E&P wastes (IOGGC, 1993). <br />.. - <br />The primary data quality objective of the study was to collect and analyze <br />samples that would be representative of the wastestream as a whole. To that <br />end, SCD employed a sampling strategy based on scientific principles outlined in <br />U.S. EPA's -Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical <br />Methods" publi tion SW 646, 3`d edition, 1996. Samples collected were <br />adequate in terms of number and volume, field blanks were collected at a rate of <br />10% of the total number of waste samples collected, and all quality assurance <br />procedures established for each test method were followed. Statistical analyses <br />of the data were also completed and those findings are included with the <br />discussion of results in this report. <br />2. Site selection criteria <br />E&P waste samples were collected at six oil production facilities in Los Angeles <br />County and two oil production facilities in Kern County. Although the sampling <br />sites were selected by SCD, participation in the study by each facility took place <br />on a voluntary basis. <br />Sampling sites in Los Angeles County were of interest to DTSC due to their <br />location in highly populated business or residential districts, and their proximity to <br />public schools. Due to concerns regarding potential impacts of E&P wastes on <br />children's health, DTSC selected for sampling facilities that produced oil (and <br />therefore E&P wastes) within a quarter of a mile distance of a public school. <br />Whenever possible, the sites were selected from different oil fields, to help <br />diversify the sampling points. <br />In general, oil production facilities sampled in Los Angeles County were small- <br />scale oil producers, occupying one or two blocks, and producing oil from older <br />reservoirs by making use of waterflood, a type of enhanced recovery operation. <br />By contrast, facilities sampled in Kern County are representative of large-scale oil <br />production. These facilities were selected based on their diversity of operation <br />and availability of wastestreams of interest. General features included: extensive <br />areas of operation in a rural -type setting, on-site recycling of certain types of <br />wastes, and use of enhanced oil recovery by steam injection, a process known <br />as steamflood. <br />Statewide Com liance Division,., Mav 2002 <br />WE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.