Laserfiche WebLink
Jeffery Setness, et al <br /> Re: Chase Properties <br />` September 20, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> GeoEnvironmental (AGE), provide full and timely disclosure of all requested information. <br /> We have not yet received critical information that has been requested. <br /> On September 1, 2000, the above referenced parties met to discuss the progress and <br /> I schedule of the environmental assessments and remedial activities at the Chase sites. <br />" The impending September 22, 2000 date for submittal of the administrative Draft <br /> Remedial Action Plan (DRAP) to the DISC, and the information required from the <br />' owner and AGE to augment the DRAP were discussed at the meeting. These data <br /> requests had previously been made in letters dated August 25 and 31, 2000, and in <br /> d several telephone calls and email messages from Treadwell & Rollo to AGE. AGE <br /> stated at the September 1, 2000 meeting and in subsequent phone conversations with <br /> Treadwell & Rollo that the requested information would be provided immediately, but to <br /> date none has been received. <br /> 1 <br /> We want the draft and final RAPs to be complete and accurate, and take into account <br /> remedial alternatives which have reportedly already been evaluated or proposed by <br /> AGE. The Draft RAP and RAP will present the preferred.remedial alternatives for all the <br /> North Shore properties, and, along with information and findings presented in the <br /> recently-completed Remedial Investigation/Feasibiltiy Study (RI/FS) and Risk <br /> Assessment, should expedite the closure of the sites, to the benefit of all parties <br /> involved. As discussed on September 1, 2000, neither the RWQCB nor SJCEHD can <br /> determine final cleanup goals or timelines for 424 North Van Buren Street without <br /> adequate treatment system performance data. Accordingly, I am requesting that both <br /> f agencies assume the oversight of these sites as a priority and press for the presentation <br /> s of accurate information from whomever they believe can address this situation. <br /> t <br /> I am at a loss as to why we have not yet received the 424 North Van Buren Street <br /> remediation system evaluation and proposed system upgrade which AGE has indicated <br /> was prepared some time ago, and previously submitted to SJCEHD. Additionally, <br /> ' understand that AGE has proposed to conduct additional investigation work in the <br /> j northwest portion of 423 North Madison Street where additional contamination has been <br /> documented. We have not seen any workplan for this effort to date; however,,,Mr. <br /> Setness has assured me this would be forthcoming shortly. We also require information <br /> ' on how much Tank Fund money has been expended at each Chase site, as Mr: Gordon <br /> Boggs of the RWQCB stated that these funds would be available to continue site <br /> remediation activities regardless of ownership transfer. Mr. Boggs, if I understand <br /> correctly, you indicated on September 1, 2000, that the Tank Fund would adequately <br /> # cover site remediation at these sites. Accordingly, any assistance in processing the <br /> necessary paperwork on behalf of your agencies would be greatly appreciated. <br /> t <br /> 3 <br /> t <br /> r <br /> t <br />