Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> i <br /> • 23 May 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> 3 <br /> monitoring activities Pumping and disposal was completed by Nor Cal Oil, Inc of Denair, <br /> California All waste was disposed at Americlean, Inc located in Silver Springs, Nevada A copy <br /> of the waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix B The location of the three-stage clarifier <br /> is illustrated in Figure 2 <br /> 22 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES , <br /> On 28 February 2001, a Solmst water level meter was used to measure the depth to groundwater in <br /> ' 15 monitoring wells at the subject site relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water <br /> elevations and hydraulic gradient were determined from these data(Table 1) <br /> After depth to water measurements were recorded,monitoring wells MW-1,MW-2,MW-4,MW-13, <br /> MW-19A, MW-19B, MW-20A, MW-20B, MW-21A and MW-21B were purged using submersible <br /> ' purge pumps Monitoring was perrformed in accordance with the revised monitoring schedule <br /> established at a 03 April 1998 meeting with the PHS-EHD The purge pumps were decontaminated <br /> prior to purging each well by pumping an Alconox solution followed by pumping tap water <br /> ' . Approximately three casing-water volumes of water(approximately eight to eighteen gallons) were <br /> removed from each of the purged wells Temperature, pH and conductivity of purged water were <br /> measured at regular purge-volume intervals using a Hydac water analyzer The recorded field data <br /> ' and logs are included in Appendix A All purged water was stored m 55'gallon DOT-approved <br /> drums on-site <br /> r <br /> 2 3 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> y 4 <br /> ' The depth to water was remeasured immediately following purging each well to gauge the recharge <br /> rate and'to assure a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior to sampling Water samples were <br /> collected from each purged well using new disposable bailers Samples were transferred into 40-m1 r <br /> EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and <br /> into 1-liter amber bottles without preservative The samples were labeled, stored on ice and <br /> transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical,Inc (MAI), a California Department <br /> 1 of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory Each sample was analyzed for <br /> Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline(TPH-g),total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> ' quantified as diesel (TPH-d) and total petroleum. hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil <br /> (TPH-mo) in accordance with EPA Methods 5030/8015 and 355018015, respectively, and <br /> Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> . (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8020/602 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />