Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> , I <br /> � I <br /> f <br /> 16 1 <br /> _ , I <br /> 28 February 1997 i <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br /> 6 2 3 FEASIBILITY TESTING <br /> ,Aquifer testing has not,been performed at the site However, sand is present from just below the <br /> ' ground water surface to 18 feet below ground water surface <br /> f i l <br /> There are several disadvantages to "pump and treat' methods The most serious disadvantages <br /> include 1) extended cleanup periods, resulting in increased total costs, although the maintenance <br /> for this method is relatively cost-effective and 2) regulatory cleanup goals are rarely attainable, <br /> mostly due to persistent hydrocarbons detected in subsequent sampling events Gr6und water T' <br /> ' extraction is generally not a desirable method for remediation However, this technology is useful <br /> for hydraulic control to prevent spreading of the contaminant plume <br /> 6 2 4 DURATION` <br /> Experience has shown that all systems involving ground water extraction require much more time <br /> than would be anticipated from aquifer tests and'calculations of ground water discharge rates, and <br /> ' seldom achieve regulatory goals for ground water clean-up Systems typically operate for, several , <br /> years During this time,pumps and other equipment may need replacement several times Currently, <br /> the primary utility of pump-and-treat systems is in control migration of contaminated grourfd water <br /> E <br /> i <br /> 6 2 5 COST <br /> Ground water extraction is usually a very costly method of ground water treatment Costs for' <br /> installation of a"pump and treat" system typically ranges from $20,000 00 to $30,000 00,including <br /> 'the installation of one or more large-diameter extraction wells Once extracted, the contaminated <br /> water must be treated or disposed Treatment is highly dependant upon the concentrations of <br /> dissolved hydrocarbons in the ground water For the Chase Chevrolet - Madison site, the cost per <br /> gallon could be as great as $2 00, based upon the extraction/treatment of approximately 100,000 ; <br /> gallons of contaminated ground water Costs for the entire treatment project would likely be between <br /> $100,000 00 and $300,000 00 <br /> S i t <br /> , f <br /> ' 6 3 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATIONBIOENHANCEMENT <br /> i f <br /> 6 3 1 BASIC PRINCIPLES <br /> 1 , <br /> Bioremediation involves the introduction of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes and/or supplemental <br /> nutrients to enhance naturally-occurring bacteria,through wells into the ground water The microbes <br /> I <br /> r <br /> i <br />