Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 28 January 1996 <br /> ' AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> ' 23 SITE ASSESSMENT <br /> Between 1990 and 1994, five ground water monitoring wells and two soil borings were installed at <br /> rthe site by Resna Industries Hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water were encountered during <br /> the initial investigation Results of the Resna investigation have been summarized in numerous reports <br /> ' submitted between 1990 and 1994, and are not recounted herein <br /> In 1995, AGE completed assessment of hydrocarbon-impacted soil by advancing 17 soil probings at <br /> ' the site four probings were installed near each former tank location for Tanks No 1, 2 and 8, five <br /> probings were installed near the former location of Tank No 3 Soil samples were collected from 13 <br /> probings, ground water samples were collected from five probings Results of the later assessment <br /> ' investigation were summarized in the Quarterly Report -June 1995 prepared by AGE <br /> 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 3 1 DRILLING AND SAMPLING <br /> To complete the assessment of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water at the site, AGE installed four <br /> additional ground water monitoring wells Between 26 and 28 September 1995, borings MW-11, <br /> MW-12 and MW-13 were advanced to depths of 37 feet below surface grade (bsg), and were <br /> completed as ground water monitoring wells On 17 November 1995, one soil boring was advanced <br /> immediately east of the site in Madison Street Boring MW-18 was advanced to a depth of 36 feet <br /> ' bsg and completed as a ground water monitoring well Well locations are illustrated in Figure 2 <br /> ' All borings were drilled using a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig The drill rig and two-man crew <br /> were supplied by Soils Exploration Services, Inc (SES) of Benicia, California During drilling, auger <br /> returns were monitored for the presence of organic vapors using a photo-ionization detector(PID <br /> ' Thermo Environmental 580A, 10 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene) <br /> Soil samples were collected ahead of the drill bit using a split-tube sampler loaded with three pre- <br /> cleaned 2-inch by 6-inch brass sleeves The samples were collected at five-foot intervals, using a 140- <br /> pound hammer to advance the sampler 18 inches The number of blows required to advance the <br /> sampler in 6-inch increments was recorded on the boring logs To avoid cross-contamination, the <br /> ' sampling equipment was washed in an Alconox solution and rinsed with water prior to each sampling <br /> run Augers were steam-cleaned between borings Auger returns were placed on plastic sheeting and <br /> stored on-site <br /> ' Each soil sample collected for analysis was preserved in the lead sleeve by covering both ends of the <br /> . sleeve with Teflon sheets, capping and sealing with tape The samples were then stored on ice and <br /> ' transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) in Pacheco, California <br />