Laserfiche WebLink
1 Data Provided with this Report <br /> i Regional Site Location Map(Figure 1) <br />' Topographic Map of Site(Figure 2) <br /> Site Activity Map(Figure 3) <br /> Map Depicting Groundwater Flow Direction(Figure 4) <br />' Hydrograph and TPH-Gas and Benzene Concentrations for PT-MW-1 (Figure 5) <br /> Monitoring Well Soundmg Data(Table 1) <br />' Summary of Monitoring Well Sounding Data(Table 2) <br /> Summary of Water Sample Analytical Results(Table 3) <br /> Summary of Individual Monitoring Well Water Sample Results(Table 4) <br />' Appendix 1- Groundwater Monitoring Procedures <br /> Appendix 2- Groundwater Monitoring Well Data Logs <br />' Appendix 3- Analytical Laboratory Reports for Samples Collected from the Wells <br />' 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> 221 Groundwater Monitoring <br />' Groundwater monitoring wells for the 521 North Cherokee Lane (former Parmar Texaco site)were <br /> monitored on June 11, 2004 The locations of the monitoring well are depicted on both Figures 3 and 4 <br /> All well monitoring and sampling was conducted in accordance with the monitoring procedures outlined in <br /> the attached Appendix 1 and by verbal directives issued by PHSEHD The wells were initially inspected <br />' for integrity and general maintenance condition with the findings reported on the Monitoring Well Data <br /> Sheets presented in Appendix 2 The wells were then probed for depth to the groundwater surface and <br /> depth to bottom of each well <br /> Initially, the depth to water surface was measured by an electronic water level indicator that allowed <br /> measurement of depth to approximately 0 01 foot These water surface depths for each well were then <br />' recorded on the individual monitoring well data sheets contained in Appendix 2 After depth to water was <br /> determined, a clear, acrylic bailer was used to visually inspect an undisturbed sample from the top of the <br /> water column to determine if a product layer or sheen was present A pronounced sheen and product layer <br />' was visible on the tape and the bailers used to sample monitoring walls MW-1, 2, and 3 These wells had a <br /> slight free-product layer at least 0 005 foot thick All other wells had no reported petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> actor or sheen on the water surface <br /> The water level indicator was then used with a weight to measure the total depth of each monitoring well <br /> in order to determine the volume of water in each well casing volume These measurements and the <br /> Icalculated well casing volume for each well was recorded in Appendix 2 <br /> Each of the wells was then purged with a low-purge rate submersible electric water pump or hand bailed <br />' using a disposable bailer Groundwater electrical conductivity, pH, and temperature were all recorded as <br /> each casing volume of water was removed from the wellbore Data was recorded on the Monitoring Well <br /> Data Sheets Groundwater monitoring results are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2 Once the groundwater <br />' parameters were stabilized a water sample was collected <br /> • <br /> Ma-D\Envunnmmm]\PwmarTexaco\Repom\063004QMR wN 2 <br /> I <br />