Laserfiche WebLink
Roberts Petroleum Services Facility July 11, 1990 <br /> Project No. 1628G y Page 2 <br /> a <br /> An Exceltech geologist togged the boring with soil descriptions classfied according to the Unified <br /> Soil Classification System and Munsell Soil Color Charts. Before drilling <br /> Y i� bean at the site, all g <br /> drilling and sampling equipment was steam cleaned to reduce the potential for cross-contamination. <br /> During drilling and between soil sampling intervals, the soil��samplker was scrubbed and washed <br /> with trisodium phosphate solution and rinsed with potable water. <br /> a <br /> Soil samples were collected at approximately 5-foot depth intervals through the hollow-stem auger <br /> to minimize cross contamination and sampling of slough. A modified California split-spoon ; <br /> 3 sampler, equipped with three internal brass liners, each 6 inches long and 2 inches in diameter, <br /> was used to collect and retain the samples. The sampler was advanced 18 inches into the relatively <br /> undisturbed soils ahead of the auger by driving it with a 140-1pound rig-operated hammer. After <br /> recovery from the borehole, the sampler was broken do w}n into its component parts. The <br /> lowermost sample liner from each set of samples collected above thel`water table was preserved for <br />' laboratory analysis. <br /> 1 { <br /> The ends of the liner were covered with aluminum foil and plastic caps. It was then labeled with a <br /> unique sample number and pertinent sample information,placed in a plastic "Ziploc" bag, entered <br /> onto a chain-of-custody form, and packed in a chilled ice chest. The soil in the remaining liners <br /> was visually characterized and checked for petroleum vapors`. Hydrocarbon soil vapor <br /> concentrations were measured in the field with an OVM 580A photoionzation detector. <br /> Soil cuttings generated from the drilling of the exploratory boring were placed on plastic sheeting, <br /> covered, and left on-site pending the laboratory analytical results. Details of the subsurface <br /> conditions encountered are shown on the boring log included inp Appendix A. Appendix B <br /> includes Exceltech protocol for soil sampling. <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction { <br />�. Upon completion, the exploratory borehole was converted to a groundwater monitoring well (MW- <br /> 8). Four-inch-diameter, Schedule 40 PVC blank and factory-slotted casings with flush-threaded <br /> couplings were set through the augers. No solvents or!I cements were used during well <br /> construction. An Exceltech geologist determined the placement of the screened interval in the field. <br /> The well was installed to monitor the uppermost water-bearing zone. <br /> a <br /> After the PVC well casingwas installed, No. 3 sand was oared down the annular space between <br /> P P <br /> F <br /> the augers and the well casing to make the desired sand pack.! The augers were pulled out of the <br /> E ground a few feet at a time during sanding. Sand filled the annular space to approximately 2 feet <br /> above the top of the screened interval. Approximately 1-1/2 feet of bentonite pellets was placed on r <br /> top of the sand and hydrated. A cement grout seal was then placed in the annulus up to the ground <br /> surface. A vault box, set in concrete around the wellhead, completed the well installation. <br /> Appendix A contains construction details of the well. <br /> Well Development <br /> After <br /> I� M <br /> e construction, the well was developed to improve the hydraulic c�onductivity between the well <br /> and the natural formation. The development was conducted by;�a surge-and-purge method on April <br /> 25 and 26, 1990. A surge block was used to surge the water in and out of the screen and sand <br /> pack. <br />