Laserfiche WebLink
880 Victor Road,Lodi <br /> Former Shell Service Station <br /> Page 2 <br /> EHD agrees the aquifer test has demonstrated the effectiveness of groundwater extraction <br /> for dissolved MTBE removal,but the proposed one-week per-quarter groundwater <br /> extraction schedule is insufficient as interim remediation. Currently the vertical extent of the <br /> contamination plume has not been determined. However,if one assumes the immediate <br /> volume of the contamination plume to just be a 10-foot thick saturated soil zone <br /> corresponding to the screened interval (53 to 63 feet bsg) within a 60-foot radius <br /> (approximate distance between MW-4 and MW-2),with 30%reflective porosity and 7.48 <br /> gallons per cubic foot, the calculation yields a volume of 253,790 gallons of impacted <br /> groundwater. The report proposed groundwater extraction at approximately 0.7 gpm for <br /> one week (assuming 7 days rather than 5 days) once per quarter. At this rate only 28,224 <br /> gallons of groundwater would be extracted in a year,which is approximately 11 % of the <br /> immediate groundwater plume. As an interim remediation this appears to be inadequate and <br /> is unlikely to exert any significant hydrogeological control of contaminant migration. <br /> MTBE was detected in multiple soil samples (Table 2) from both the vadose zone and the <br /> saturated zone. Groundwater table fell from approximately 48 feet bsg in 1999 to <br /> approximately 52 feet bsg in 2002. Based on the well logs and the CPT logs, significant sand <br /> intervals exist from about 10 feet bsg to 30 feet bsg, and from 35 feet to 60 feet bsg. Due to <br /> the high MTBE concentrations in the vadose zone,and the lack of a significant barrier <br /> against vertical migration of residual soil contamination to groundwater,EHD recommends <br /> that interim remediation in the vadose zone also be considered. Soil vapor extraction (SVE) <br /> may be a good remediation candidate at this site. SVE is particularly effective against MTBE <br /> due to MTBE's high vapor pressure (250 millimeter of Hg in pure phase,versus 86 mm of <br /> Hg for benzene) and its tendency to volatilize. <br /> Table 2: Concentrations of MTBE in Micrograms Per Kilogram (mg/kg) in Soil <br /> Samples by Method 8260B <br /> Sample MW-1 I MW-2 MW-3 Sample SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 CPT-1 <br /> Depth Nov-99 /DTW 48'bs Depth Jan-99 /DTW— 50'bs Oct-01 <br /> 30.5' 1.79 1.42 0.867 25' 92.9 2.01 0.226 46.6 ------ <br /> 40.5' 1.65 0.0378 ------ 35' 15 1.76 ------ ------ ------ <br /> 45.5' 0.0205 ------ 2.13 40.5' 1.09 7.94 ------ ------ ------ <br /> 57.5' 0.00806 0.0205 ------ 50' ------ ----- 2.36 0.507 ------ <br /> ' ------ 0.294 56' ------ 0.135 ------ ------ <br /> 60.5 ------ ------ <br /> ------ ------ ------ 60' ------ — - — 0.459 ------ <br /> ----- 62' ------ ----- 3.5 <br /> Submit to EHD by May 2, 2003 a work plan addendum to implement a continuous <br /> groundwater extraction interim remediation system as a measure to remove the dissolved <br /> contaminant mass and to establish migratory control over the contaminant plume. The <br /> work plan addendum should also include a proposal for removing the residual MTBE mass <br /> in the soil. <br />