Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> 2.3 Regulatory Interface <br /> Representatives of Upgradient and Teresi met on December 29, 1995 and again on January 10, <br /> 1996 to discuss assessment options Recognizing the difficulty of in-situ remediation of diesel- <br /> contaminated soil, the possibility of further excavation of contaminated soil was discussed <br /> Upgradient recommended drilling a soil boring in the most contaminated portion of the excavation <br /> to assess the vertical extent of contamination Based on that information, it would then be <br /> possible to determine whether further excavation could remediate the contamination as well as <br /> assess its lateral extent, or whether additional drilling would be required to delineate the lateral <br /> extent A work plan proposing this approach was submitted to PHS/EHD on January 12 <br /> After conferring with representatives of the State Underground Tank Cleanup Fund regarding the <br /> proposed investigation, Mr Ron Rowe of PHS/EHD informed Upgradient that he would not <br /> approve a plan proposing only assessment of the vertical extent of contamination Instead, <br /> PHS/EHD required the assessment of the vertical and lateral extent of both soil and groundwater <br /> contamination In his written response to Upgradient's work plan, Mr Rowe required a minimum <br /> of three soil borings, with the probablility that one or more of these would be completed as <br /> groundwater monitoring wells In subsequent oral communication, he directed Upgradient to <br /> position one well directly south of the former pump island and one south of the tank facility, in <br /> anticipation of a south or southeastward groundwater flow direction In addition, he informed <br /> Upgradient that PHS/EHD has recently instituted a new policy requiring analysis for methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) at all sites because it may be more widespread than previously <br /> thought <br /> Furthermore, because a buried, out-of-use, 12-inch-diameter domestic well had been discovered <br /> within the fueling facility during the tank removal activities, Mr Rowe directed Upgradient to <br /> perform a down-hole television survey of this well, measure its depth, and collect a groundwater <br /> sample from it before performing and other assessment activities <br /> Upgradient submitted a work plan addendum on January 24 reflecting these requirements and <br /> obtained approval from Mr Rowe to partially backfill the pump island excavation in order to <br /> create a drill site there Clean soil from the east end of the soil stockpile was used as backfill <br /> The addendum was approved on January 25, and the domestic well survey was scheduled for <br /> February 1 <br /> 3.0 FIELD PROCEDURES <br /> 3.1 Domestic Well Survey <br /> A Solinst 200-foot water level meter was used to measure the depth to groundwater in the <br /> domestic well and to measure the total depth of the well on February 1, 1996 Groundwater was <br /> 2 <br />