Laserfiche WebLink
DEC-03-2007 11:38 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.08 <br /> 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESSTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer ®Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure El Vacuum ®Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +/-0.002" <br /> Fill Sump#87 Fill Sump#DSI Fill Sump#91 Fill Sump#vpr sump <br /> Sump Diameter: 52" 50" 49" 40" <br /> Sump Depth: 85" 84" g4" 331• <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of 16" 42" 32" 12" <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest 33" 28" 30" 9" <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to <br /> testis Good Good quad Good <br /> Portion of Sump Tested 2"above piping 2"above piping 2"above piping 2"above piping <br /> Sump Material: <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> prasurelvacuum/water and 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: 3:57 pro 1:42 pm 1:42 pin 4:49 pm <br /> Initial Reading(Rj): 4.2016 5.3652 3.1858 1.2198 <br /> Test End Time: 4:12 pm 1:57 pm 2:12 pm 5:04 pm <br /> Final Reading(RF): 4.20I5 5.3651 3.1861 1.2196 <br /> Test Duration: 15 min. 15 min. 25 min. 15 min. <br /> Change in Reading(RrP,): -0.0001 -0.0001 +0.0003 -0.0002 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" +/-0.002" +40.00211 +/-0.002" <br /> Test Result: ® Pass Fail M Pass Fail El Pass Fail ® Pass Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sump? ❑ Yes ❑No ® Yes ❑No 0 Yes ❑No ® Yea ❑No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is ❑Yes❑No ®NA ❑Yes❑No®NA ❑Yes❑ No®NA ❑Yes❑No ®NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testis ?_ ®Yes❑No ❑NA ®Yes❑No LINA ®Yes ❑No QNA 0 Yes❑No DNA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and ®Yes❑No ❑NA ®Yes❑No[INA IM Yes❑No❑NA ®Yes❑No❑NA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing,and recorn"iended follow-upforfailed lestS) <br /> "Sensor functionality was not confirmed This procedure is not part of the <br /> Secondary Containment testing stove of work". <br />