Laserfiche WebLink
IL <br /> r <br /> i • 173 May 2004 , <br /> AGE-NC Project No 03-1100 <br /> iPage 2 of 4 <br /> i hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative After collection, the samples were properly labeled, <br /> placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental <br /> Laboratories, Inc (CTEL) for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> i <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) In accordance with EPA <br /> x <br /> Method 8015-modified, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and xylenes(BTEX)In accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> and <br /> • Fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME),and tertiary butanol(TBA) <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 8260B u <br /> I - <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br />' 03 March 2004 The contaminant impact to ground watcr was quantified by the laboratory analytical <br /> data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br />' At the time of the March 2004 sampling event, depths to ground water ranged from 42 53 feet to <br /> 43 99 feet below the tops of the well casings During this monitoring event, the ground water level <br /> in the wells was approximately 12 53 to 13 99 feet below the tops of the well screens,indicating that <br />' the wells are screened properly and yield representative shallow ground water samples <br /> Ground water elevations at the site ranged from 23 07 feet below mean sea level (MSL) in well <br />' MW-7 to 24 17 feet below MSL in well MW-2 (Table 1) The relative ground water elevation at the <br /> site decreased an average of 0 64 feet between the December 2003 and March 2004 monitoring ^ <br /> events _ J <br /> Wells MW-1 through MW-7 were used to Infer ground water flow direction and gradient The <br /> ground water flow direction was inferred to be flowing inwards towards an elongated depression in <br /> the former UST location The hydraulic gradient averaged 0 03 feet/feet or less Figure 3 illustrates <br /> the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 03 March 2004 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvrronmental,Inc <br /> 1 ' <br /> r <br />