Laserfiche WebLink
Roberts Oil Company May 23, 1988 <br />Project No. 1628G Page 5 <br />1.) The apparent ground -water flow direction appears to have changed direction <br />from southeasterly (Kleinfelder, 1987), to southwesterly (Exceltech data) <br />over a one year period. The change in flow direction could be due to local <br />ground -water pumping influence. A well location survey should be <br />performed to determine the existence of ground -water wells within a one- <br />quarter mile radius of the site. This information can be obtained by <br />contacting local and state agencies. <br />2.) The field analytical data indicate that well MW -1 has a history of free- <br />floating product. Well MW -4 analytical results indicate that TEH as diesel <br />is present in the ground -water west of the above -ground tank farm in <br />relatively low concentrations. No detectable concentrations of TVH as <br />gasoline or BTX were present in wells MW -2, MW -3, or MW -4. <br />3.) Three additional monitoring wells should be installed and sampled for the <br />purpose of defining the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination on <br />site. One well would be located southeast of the transfer block to monitor <br />ground water in a former downgradient direction (Figure 3). Another <br />monitoring well would be located near the southwest corner of the property <br />in the current downgradient direction. This well is needed to ascertain the <br />extent of TEH contamination downgradient of well MW -4. The third <br />monitoring well would be located upgradient and north of the transfer block. <br />4.) Copies of this report should be forwarded to the San Joaquin Local Health <br />District (SJLHD) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />(RWQCB), Central Valley Region in a timely manner. <br />