My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001566
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1501
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0508175
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2019 2:31:43 PM
Creation date
5/16/2019 2:25:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001566
RECORD_ID
PR0508175
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007977
FACILITY_NAME
WOOLSEY OIL CARDLOCK
STREET_NUMBER
1501
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16337016
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1501 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r t <br /> • Mr Michael lnfurna <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> The UST's along with product dispensers and associated piping were removed under permit from San <br /> Joaquin County PHS/EHD on January 19, 1999 Analytical results of the soil samples collected from <br /> beneath the UST's and the former dispenser island indicated contamination by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons Analytical results from the tank removal are summarized in Table 1 Sample locations <br /> are depicted on Figure 2 <br /> On April 19 and April 20, 1999, Ground Zero conducted a subsurface investigation in order to <br /> determine the lateral and vertical extent of contamination Two borings, SB 1 and SB2, were advanced <br /> to a depth of approximately 16 feet bgs in the area proposed for installation of new UST's in order to <br /> determine the suitability of the material for backfilling the excavation These borings were located west <br /> of the office building on the property(Figure 2) <br /> The remaining six soil borings, SB3 through SB8, were advanced to investigate the lateral and vertical <br /> extent of residual soul contamination, as well as the potential impact to groundwater Borings SB3 <br /> through SB8 were located around the perimeter of the UST excavation and in the area of the former <br /> lines and dispensers <br /> Soil and groundwater samples collected from borings SB3 and SB5-SB8 had non-detectable levels for <br /> the target analytes However, boring SB4/SB4A had elevated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> in soil at a depth of 15 feet Soil at a depth of 20 feet did not contain detectable concentrations <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were also detected in the groundwater sample collected from this boring The <br /> data obtained from this investigation indicated that the vertical extent of contamination did not exceed <br /> 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) and defined the lateral extent of soil contamination The <br /> contaminants consisted primarily of diesel hydrocarbons and methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) Soil <br /> results are summanzed in Table 1 Groundwater results are summarized in Table 2 Sample locations <br /> are depicted on Figure 2 <br /> Based on the results of this investigation, source removal excavation was proposed in the Corrective <br /> Action Workplan dated June 2, 1999 <br /> Contaminated soul excavation and confirmation sampling occurred in two stages—the first on June 16 <br /> and the second on June 30, 1999 The additional excavation was conducted in order to remove a small <br /> volume of contaminated soil remaining after the first stage of work <br /> On June 16, 1999, approximately 200 cubic yards of contaminated soil and 20 yards of overburden was <br /> excavated by Johnson Petroleum within the vicinity of the existing tank pit The area excavated was <br /> irregular in shape and vaned in depth Seven confirmation soil samples were collected from the <br /> excavation walls Analytical results from these samples indicated that a small volume of contaminated <br /> soil remained Groundwater samples were also collected from within the excavation Analytical results <br /> indicated that the groundwater was impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> t� <br /> Woolseychaaer\reporWsummary doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.