Laserfiche WebLink
(11 r <br /> groundwater surface beneath the site, possibly due to the heterogeneous nature of the soils and/or <br /> the varying well depths <br /> On December 6, 1996, groundwater samples were collected from wells MW1R, MW2, MW3, <br /> MW4, MW5R2, and MW6, after purging at least three casing volumes of water Monitoring <br /> wells were purged and sampled In accordance with the field methods included In Attachment 1 <br /> Well purge logs are included as Attachment 2 <br /> LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> Groundwater samples were transported under chain of custody protocol to Sequoia Analytical <br /> Laboratory In Redwood City, California (ELAP #1210) for analysis of benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) utilizing EPA method 8020, total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg) and as diesel (TPHd) utilizing EPA method 8015 modified, and halogenated <br /> volatile organics (HVOCs) utilizing EPA method 8010 <br /> An unidentified hydrocarbon in the TPHd range was detected at concentrations ranging from 96 <br /> parts per billion (ppb) to 770 ppb In wells MW-3, MW-4, MW-5R2, and MW-6 BTEX and <br /> TPHg were not detected in any of the samples Analytical results of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents are summarized in Table 2 Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody <br /> documentation are included In Attachment 3 <br /> HVOCs 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were detected in the sample collected from <br /> monitoring well MW5R2 at concentrations of 5 1 ppb and 2 7 ppb, respectively Both HVOCs <br /> were detected at concentrations below their respective maximum contaminant levels Analytical <br /> results of HVOCs are summarized in Table 3 Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody <br /> documentation are included in Attachment 3 <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> During the last two quarters of monitoring, HVOCs, BTEX, and TPHg concentrations have <br /> steadily decreased BTEX and TPHg have not been detected since June 1995 HVOC <br /> concentrations have not exceeded the State of California Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant <br /> Levels (MCLs) since June 1995 Based on this data, Smith Technology believes that site closure <br /> activities are warranted After regulatory approval has been received, a closure report requesting <br /> site closure will be prepared in accordance with the guidelines outlined by CRWQCB <br /> correspondence dated October 7, 1993 (Addendum to Appendix A of the Tri-Regional <br /> Recommendations) The closure report will also contain a workplan for the abandonment of the <br /> onsite monitoring wells <br /> i <br /> w 1943311quarllyl4gr--1996 doe 2 <br /> • <br /> SMITH <br />