Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water • <br /> g Quality Control Board :> <br /> vCentral Valley Region <br /> Robert Schneider Chair <br /> Terry Tamminen Sacramento Main Office <br /> Secretary for Internet Address: http://w .sw eb.ca.gov/mgcb5 Arnold Schwartenegger <br /> Environmental 11020 Sun Center Drive#200 Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114D Governor <br /> J�:.:�t� l: -� -:. <br /> Protection � Phone(916)464-3291 Fax(916)464-4797 � <br /> JUN 15 2004 L� <br /> 14 June 2004 ENVIRONMENT HLALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Mr. Ken Price <br /> Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc. <br /> 2480 Fortune Dr., Suite 300 <br /> Lexington, KY 40509-4168 <br /> REQUEST FOR CLEANUP PLAN, 1904 CHARTER WAY,SAN JOA QUIN COUNTY <br /> Between 1955 and 1993, the 4.2-acre site at 1904 Charter Way had been an agricultural chemical <br /> distribution facility, operated by a succession of owners and operators. Groundwater constituents of <br /> concern include nitrate, ammonium, atrazine,bromacil, dinoseb, 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP), 1,2,3- <br /> trichloropropane (1,2,3-TCP), and other constituents. On behalf of the other operators, Miller Springs <br /> Remediation Management(MSRM) is coordinating the investigation and remediation of the site. <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) staff have reviewed the history <br /> of the site, distribution of constituents,remediation activities, analysis of additional remedial activities, <br /> and recommendations, as presented in the following reports prepared by Geomatrix Consultants: <br /> • April 2002 LTTD Soil Remediation Report <br /> • September 2003 Feasibility Study/Remedial Options Evaluation Report for Groundwater <br /> Remediation (FS/RO) <br /> • October 2003 Second Semiannual and Annual 2003 Monitoring Report <br /> • February 2004 Analyses for 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <br /> • April 2004 First Semiannual 2004 Monitoring Report <br /> Soil Remediation <br /> hi its 13 July 1999 Revised Feasibility Study for Soil Remediation, MSRM outlined a strategy to <br /> remediate soil at this site by excavating and treating the most contaminated area of soil, and establishing <br /> a phytoremediation plot to remediate nitrate and low concentrations of pesticides in soil in the remainder <br /> of the property. In late 2001, pursuant to its 13 June 2001 Soil Remediation Plan, Geomatrix <br /> Consultants excavated and successfully treated about 2,900 tons of contaminated soil with low <br /> temperature thermal destruction, as reported in the April 2002 LTTD Soil Remediation Report. <br /> In the summer of 2003, Geomatrix planted about 1,500 eucalyptus trees as proposed in its 8 November <br /> 2001 Phytoremediation Work Plan. The primary objective of the phytoremediation plot is to remove <br /> nitrogen from the soil column by biological uptake. A secondary objective is to accelerate degradation <br /> of residual pesticides in soil. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Co Recycled Paper <br />