Laserfiche WebLink
e <br /> y State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Alan C.Lloyd,Ph.D. Executive Office AUGArnold Schwarienegger <br /> Agency Secretary 200p 5 A 3 O Governor <br /> Arthur G.Baggett Jr.,Chair PM 1: <br /> 10011 Street•Sacramento,California 95814•(916)34,1-5615 <br /> Mailing Address:P.O.Box 100•Sacramento,California• IN0.10<<;j !f C Q jJPd T Y <br /> Fax(916)341-5621•http://www.waterboards.ca. E N`d I N(),"J HE T A L <br /> INIALTH UEp4RTNENT <br /> AUG 2 9 2005 <br /> CERTIFIED MAIL <br /> Mr. Peter Wallace <br /> Peter J. Wallace, Sr. Trust <br /> 7455 Pasaro Drive East <br /> Scottsdale, AZ 85262 <br /> Dear Mr. Wallace: <br /> PETITION OF PETER J. WALLACE, SR. TRUST (USTCF CLAIM 1714), 348 WEST <br /> HARDING WAY, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA: DISMISSAL <br /> SWRCB/OCC FILE UST-229 <br /> After careful consideration, it is concluded that the petition in this matter fails to raise substantial <br /> issues that are appropriate for review by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water <br /> Board). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as of this date. (See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 23, <br /> § 2814.4, subd. (a)(1); see also People v. Barry(19 87) 194 Cal.App.3d 158 [239 Cal.Rptr. 349].) <br /> You submitted a petition on behalf of the Peter J. Wallace, Sr. Trust (petitioner) seeking review <br /> of the Division of Financial Assistance's (Division)Final Division Decision(FDD) dated <br /> July 19, 2004, which determined that the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund(Fund) <br /> overpaid a total of$37,576.47. The Division issued a revised Final Division Decision(revised <br /> FDD) on June 15, 2005,to correct the error in the calculation of the overpayment that was <br /> discovered while reviewing the contentions in your petition. <br /> In the revised FDD, the Division concluded that the correct amount of the overpayment was <br /> $42,043.34. As explained in more detail below, the Division correctly determined that the Fund <br /> overpaid a total of$42,043.34. These costs are not eligible for reimbursement because they are <br /> attributable to ineligible chlorinated solvents. This amount will be applied toward future eligible <br /> costs and no additional eligible costs will be paid until this amount is offset. Consequently, the <br /> petition is dismissed. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 0 Recycled Paper <br />