Laserfiche WebLink
Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> After analysis of the results of the JHK and BC <br /> investigations, the following conclusions and recommendations <br /> have been made: <br /> I- Soils in the area of the wormer tank locations have <br /> _ detectable levels o; hydrocarbons. Three of the <br /> samples, GL-2B (7. 5 to 8.0 feet) , GL-2C (9. 0 to 9.5 <br /> feet) , and GL-3B <br /> the gasoline (10.0 to 10.5 feet) from the area of <br /> tank excavations have Tpu levels of 240 <br /> mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 110 mg/kg, respectively. <br /> The three samples were from' backfill material in the <br /> area of the former gasoline storage tanks . This is <br /> not an indication that the gasoline tanks were .leaking, <br /> Oxlly that the backfill material contained hydrocarbons. <br /> Soil samples from 72.0 to 12.5 feetand 15.0 to 15.5 <br /> feet in test hole GL-2 and 20.0 to 20.5 feet in GL-3 had <br /> no deL*ectabie hydrocarbon levels. These samples were <br /> from native soil below the excavation invert. One <br /> sample from below invert, GL-3F (15.5 to 15.0 feet), <br /> had a TPH level of 30 mg/kg. All other samples from <br /> soils below invert had no detectable hydrocarbons. In <br /> addition, the samples from GL-4 beneath the former pump <br /> _. islands had no detectable hydrocarbons. <br /> The source of the backfill is <br /> unknown. Hydrocarbons <br /> were not noted in the excavated soil by the County <br /> representative during excavation of ti;e three <br /> tanks. It gasoline <br /> is assumed that mixing of soil occurred <br /> during excavation of the four tanks, thus it is <br /> difficult to determi,3e which, if any, tank contributed <br /> hydrocarbons to the soil. In addition, to fill the <br /> voids left by the removea .tanks, backfill material <br /> ` had to he brought in from off site. <br /> The the off-site material is unknown. Regardle:ss '1ofethe <br /> f source, soils below the site have detectable levels o <br /> hydrocarbons. f <br /> 2. Groundwater from all monitoring wells had benzene <br /> levels at cr above the California Department of Health <br /> Services (DUS) action level of 0.7 ug/l. Monitoring <br /> we! I MW-4 had a toluene level above the DHS action <br /> level of 100 ug/l, Monitoring wells -4W-3 and W-4 had <br /> xylene, levels above to DHS action level of 620 ug/i. <br /> Monitoring well MW-4 had the highest level of all <br /> detectable components. With the exception of MW-1 , <br /> levels Gf the B.•X components in tine other walls have <br /> ris' n since the initial sampling. In addition, MW--3 and - <br /> MW-4 had detectable levels of ethyl'benzene where they <br /> did not in the initial sampling. <br />