Laserfiche WebLink
J. H. KLEINFELDER&ASSOCIATES <br /> cx <br /> i File No. W-2905-1 <br /> November 14, 1985 <br /> Page S <br /> a_a <br /> sample bottle was immediately sealed and placed in a refrigerated container. The <br /> water sample was delivered to Canonise Engineers along with a.chain-of-custcdy form, a <br /> copy of which is included in Appendix A of this report. <br /> E. Analytical Results <br /> 3 <br /> Two soil samples collected from the boring and one water sample were analyzed <br /> F by Canonie Engineers fcr benzene, toluene, xylene, and .for total extractable <br /> hydrocarbons. The results of the ch?mical analysis of the soil and;water''<amples are <br /> { <br /> presented in Appendix A and summarized on Table 1. <br /> ? Gasoline and related r:o.nstituencs were below detectable limits in soil samples. <br /> Concentrations of benzene and toluene were detected in the water sample in the range <br /> of 10 to 20 ppb. hydrocarbons as total extractable hydrocarbons was also detected in <br /> the Ovate: sample at 760 ppb, <br /> VII. LIMITATIONS <br /> f This report was prepared in general accordance with the accepted standard of <br /> practice which exists in Northern California at the time the investigation was <br /> performed. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic <br /> conditions is a difficult �V inexact art. Judgements leading tck conclusions rid <br /> recommendations are generally made with an incomplete knawledge .of the subs:irface <br /> conditions present. More extensive studies, including additional subsurface <br /> investigations can tend to reduce the inherent uncertainties associated with subsurface <br /> modeling. If the client wishes to reduce the uncertainty beyond the level associated y}l <br /> with this study, Nleinfeldel- do Associates should be notified fer additional consultation. <br />