ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001640 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chronology - 3 - 17 February 1993 Geweke submitted by a different consultant, PES Environmental (PES) . 15 Feb 91 The treatment system design was not submitted. 11 Apr 91 In a letter to County staff, Board staff stated that the second work plan was incomplete, Geweke was not in compliance with the C&A, and that the PAR should be submitted no later than 31 May 1991 . 25 Apr 91 In a letter to Geweke, County staff requested additional information for the work plan and recommended that the PAR be submitted by 31 May 1991 . 2 May 91 In a letter to Board staff, Geweke requested a time extension to 31 July 1991 for submittal of the PAR. 8 May 91 Board and County staff inspected the site during well drilling. Five additional wells were installed for a total of 15 wells. 20 May 91 In a letter to County staff, Board staff allowed the • extension, requested that a progress report be submitted by 28 June 1991 , and noted that the 15 April quarterly report was past due and must be submitted immediately. (Note that no quarterly reports had been submitted to date, as required in the C&A, although some analytical data was submitted in other reports . ) 3 Jun 91 In a letter to Geweke, County staff repeated Board staff comments and requests. 28 Jun 91 Neither .the progress report nor the quarterly report was submitted. 1 Jul 91 A progress report was submitted by PES. No quarterly report was submitted. 31 Jul •91 A PAR was submitted by PES. Four additional monitoring wells and an extraction well had been installed, an aquifer test conducted, ground water extraction, treatment, and reinjection was proposed, and a modification to the monitoring program was requested. Soil contamination had not been defined. No quarterly report was submitted, however, quarterly monitoring results were included in the PAR. 1 Aug 91 During a telephone conversation between Board and County . staffs, Geweke's failure to submit quarterly reports was i discussed.