ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001640 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7 . Chronology - 2 - 17 February 1993 Geweke 12 Jun 90 B&C submitted a progress report including the sampling report of the 5 existing wells. Four of the 5 wells were contaminated. The PAR was not yet submitted. 13 Jun 90 In a letter to Geweke, the Office of Chief Counsel agreed to hold the request for rescission in abeyance for two years from the date of the petition. 29 Jun 90 The FRP was not submitted as required by the C&A. 03 Jul 90 Four new wells were installed as per the 23 March 1990 work plan. Contamination was found and ground water contamination was not yet defined. 15 Jul 90 B&C submitted a letter reporting that samples had been collected and anticipated that a report would be submitted by 13 August 1990. 24 Aug 90 A report was submitted describing the well installation and sample results. All downgradient wells were contaminated. • 24 Aug 90 The FRP was not implemented as required by the C&A. The PAR had not yet been submitted either. 31 Aug 90 In a letter to Geweke, the Executive Officer expressed concern over the delays in investigation and required submittal of a new work plan and time schedule to define the contamination by 28 September 1990. 28 Sep 90 The new work plan and time schedule were not submitted. 1 Oct 90 During a telephone conversation, B&C staff reported to Board staff that the report would be submitted by the end of the week. 5 Oct 90 A time schedule and recommendations to install additional wells and an interim ground water treatment system was submitted by B&C. 2 Jan 91 Board and County staffs inspected the site. 15 Jan 91 In a letter to Geweke, Board staff accepted the work plan and directed that the treatment system design be submitted by 15 February 1991 . 31 Jan 91 County staff notified Geweke that the site had been placed in . the Local Oversight Program (LOP) . 12 Feb 91 A second work plan to install additional monitoring wells was