Laserfiche WebLink
3.4 Groundwater Monitoring for Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> On September 19, 1994, monitoring procedures were performed at the site Prior to <br /> sampling, the groundwater depths were measured in each well After depth measurements <br /> were collected, each well containing sufficient water was purged and sampled <br /> 3.4.1 Monitoring Well Purge Procedures <br /> A Solinst water level meter was used to measure the groundwater depth in each monitonng <br /> well (Table 3) Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 were dry An attempt was then made <br /> to purge each well containing water of a minimum of three well volumes All wells had <br /> sufficient water for purging except MW-6 and MW-8, only one gallon could be removed <br /> from these two wells <br /> All wells except EW-1 were purged using PVC bailers Well EW-1 was purged using a 2" <br /> submersible pump Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purge water %sere measured <br /> at approximately 1-gallon intervals (5-gallon intervals for EW-1) using a ICM water analyzer <br /> Monitoring well stabilization data and field sheets are included in Appendix D The water <br /> was placed in labelled DOT-approved drums and stored on-site <br /> 3 4.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> Water samples were collected from each well using clean, disposable plastic bailers The <br /> samples were collected in 40-m1 EPA vials, 1-liter amber bottles and plastic bottles Samples <br /> were transported in a chilled container to McCambell Analytical in Pacheco (MAI) The <br /> samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH as gasoline), volatile <br /> aromatics (BTE&X), volatile halocarbons, lead (Pb) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) in <br /> accordance with EPA methods 8015m, 602, 601, 7420 (239 2) and 601, respectixely <br /> 4 0 FINDINGS <br /> 4.1 Monitoring for Biological Activity <br /> The full-scale inoculation of the site was initiated on August 16, 1994 Soil vapor monitoring <br /> was initiated on August 29, 1994 Indications that bioremediation is actn'e (and presumably <br /> working) at the site would be elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and depressed <br /> concentrations of oxygen <br /> The highest concentrations of carbon dioxide and lowest concentrations of oxygen have been <br /> been measured in VW-4, VW-5 and MW-4 (see Table 2) We would expect to measure the <br /> greatest biological activity in the area of the highest concentrations of hydrocarbons, VW-4, <br /> VW-5 and MW-4 are located near the most heavily contaminated portions of the site <br /> Overall, the soil vapor monitoring results look encouraging <br /> a.obS"r,W,W s<— r.. 4 <br /> or.n<y R.wnA"n 33 cr_wa�S <br />