Laserfiche WebLink
Station No. 502, 35 N. Cherokee Lane, Lodi, - Interim Remediation Plan <br /> _ The influent level at the conclusion of the initial phase of remediation <br /> was less than 3,000 PPM. Consequently, the above <br /> rates are higher than what we actually expect to encounters and emission <br /> Deactivation <br /> When soil vapor levels have been reduced to an <br /> system will be given a final acceptable level, the <br /> ,t;onitoring and then deactivated. <br /> The above <br /> ground components of the system including the catalytic incinerator, the <br /> Pump, accumulator, fence and propane trap wagon will be rqm.+..� <br /> site. The underground piping and �nir-+4 - + cram the <br /> be used for a;;J Potential future re '�V1p will remain in place and could <br /> mediation, if necessary. <br /> PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARID REPORTING <br /> Project Macagement will coordinate the system. <br /> results, implement coaplimonitoring, review the <br /> ance control, and submit summary reports to <br /> Ultramar. Project Management will also submit routine reports on the <br /> operation as required by the Air Pollution Control <br /> District. The project <br /> management function, w?]1 be overseen by an EVAX Project Engineer,. <br /> PUBLIC HEALTH RISK <br /> R screening level assessment , <br /> of the public health risk due to the <br /> •� emission of benzene prom the incinerator was undertaken using the ARB <br /> version of the dispersion model PTPLU. <br /> benzene concentration modeled by PTpLUsas convertedaximuin ne ntou excess d-level <br /> risk using the procedures outlined in 'the CAPCOA Air Toxics Assessment <br /> ' a Manual. These procedures are quite Conservative in nature c cancer <br /> overstate the actual risk by a large margin. <br /> r9 rg and tend to <br /> I The maximum b3nzene emission rates were risk screened usicg the. risk <br /> t criteria developed by the San Francisco Bay Vea Air Quality Managemen <br /> - District {BAAQIiD). The BA,R.Q�+D <br /> generally considers projects with a cancer <br /> s risk between I to 10 case, per million population to be acceptable, <br /> t <br /> part, if the operation is short-term and involves a. T-BACT <br /> emissions control device. <br /> The risk assessment was based an an analysis <br /> since benzene has the highesof the benzene emissions <br /> t cancer risk factor of the typical <br /> constituents of gasoline. The ratio of benzene to tat; t. <br /> this emissions assessment is t ' 1 hydrocarbons in <br /> Ypical of that found in gasoline. <br /> a.�. It was determined that the exce,;s 1 ifetime cancer risk, associated with a <br /> benzene emission rate of o.zo lbs/day was .,less than 3 cases er mi]1 <br /> population based on a continuous 70 year operation. 7hIs figure is �°n <br /> ,1 <br /> -------------- <br /> 8 -. <br /> e • <br />