Laserfiche WebLink
ARCO Station #0960 • - 2 24 November 2009 <br /> 225 S. Cherokee Lane • <br /> Lodi, San Joaquin County <br /> vapor extraction was the preferred soil remediation. The three onsite monitoring wells (MW-1 <br /> through MW-3) were not destroyed prior to SJCEHD closure of the Site in 1997, but were <br /> retained for future monitoring by ARCO. <br /> Case #2: Subsequently ARCO terminated their business at the Site, and in August 2002 the <br /> remaining four 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs were removed. Approximately 45 tons of soil was <br /> disposed offsite at an unnamed location. Confirmation soil samples obtained from the UST <br /> excavation pit contained detectable concentrations of TPHg, TPHd, ethylbenzene, xylenes, <br /> and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). The maximum soil concentrations in 2002 were: TPHg, <br /> 400 mg/kg; Ethylbenzene, 1.2 mg/kg; Xylenes, 3 mg/kg; and MTBE, 1.4 mg/kg. <br /> In October 2002; the maximum groundwater monitoring results (MW-2) were: TPHg, 410 pg/L; <br /> benzene, 3.2 pg/L; toluene, 8.5 pg/L; ethylbenzene, 6 pg/L; xylenes, 9.5 pg/L; MTBE, <br /> 3.7 pg/L; and 1,2-DCA, 26 pg/L. The file indicates that SJCEHD reopened the case due to <br /> 1,2-DCA in November 2003. In March 2004 and November 2004 soil borings B-25 through <br /> B-28 were advanced to a maximum depth of 104' below ground surface (bgs). In December <br /> 2004, two additional monitoring wells (MW-4 and MW-5) were installed. A Site Closure Report <br /> was submitted in February 2006 to the SJCEHD; however, Regional Board staff did not concur <br /> to the requested closure, and the case was transferred to the Regional Board on 6 October <br /> 2006. On 31 October 2006, Regional Board staff requested an additional investigation to <br /> delineate lateral extent of the groundwater plume and a soil vapor intrusion investigation. In <br /> January 2007, four monitoring wells (MW-6 through MW-9) and three soil vapor probes (VP-2 <br /> through VP-4) were installed and sampled. Maximum groundwater concentrations in October <br /> 2008, the last monitoring event, were TPHg, 300 ug/L; MTBE, 11 ug/L; and 1,2-DCA, 1 .1 ug/L. <br /> Risk Assessment <br /> Investigations to date show the bulk of onsite soil contamination existed from 6' bgs down to <br /> 17' bgs, where the consultant determined residual soil contamination poses minimal risk to <br /> human health from direct exposure. The May 2007 soil vapor Investigation compared soil <br /> vapor sample results from three sample locations onsite with the San Francisco Bay Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). All soil vapor results <br /> were below the commercial ESLs, and the consultant determined there was no risk from vapor <br /> intrusion. The consultant determined that residual petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater did <br /> not pose a significant threat to human health or the environment. Land use (commercial) is <br /> not expected to change in the foreseeable future. <br /> Sensitive Receptor Survey <br /> The No Further Action Report (NFAR) identified one active municipal well located 812' east of <br /> the site. The nearest surface water body, the Mokelumne River, is approximately 1.2 miles <br /> north (upgradient) of the Site. The consultant determined that sensitive receptors are not <br /> threatened by residual groundwater contamination. <br /> Site Geology and Hydrogeology <br /> The NFAR listed Site soils as inter-fingered beds of gravels, sands, silts and clays down to <br /> 104' bgs, the total depth investigated. From 2004 to 2008, depth to water varied from <br />