My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
1645
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544495
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 10:55:38 AM
Creation date
5/28/2019 10:41:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0544495
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003688
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL RAILWAYS COMPANY - STOCKTON YARD
STREET_NUMBER
1645
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11910013
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1645 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.3 Time to Achieve Water Quality Objectives <br /> As discussed in Section 4.0,the proposed water quality objective for TPH-d of 210 µg/L has <br /> already been achieved. Although the more conservative USEPA water quality objective for <br /> TPH-d of loo pg/L has not yet been achieved, calculations of TPH-d degradation demonstrate <br /> that the 140 pg/L value will be achieved in a very short time period(within months). Figure 8 <br /> shows the projected degradation of TPH-d based on available data for MW-5 and a linear <br /> regression analysis (Sara, 2003). <br /> 6.o IMPACTS TO SENSITIVE RECEPTORS AND BENEFICIAL USES <br /> 6.1 Groundwater Water Supply Wells <br /> During July 2010,TRC conducted a sensitive receptor survey to determine the proximity of <br /> supply wells and other surface waters located within a 1/2 mile radius of the Site. Groundwater <br /> monitoring wells and remediation wells were not included in the survey as they are not <br /> considered sensitive receptors. <br /> According to the Department of Water Resources(DWR), five (5) active water supply wells are <br /> identified within a 1/2 mile radius of the Site.The locations of these wells are depicted in the <br /> attached Figure 9. The only well identified within the path of local groundwater flow is located <br /> approximately 1,96o feet northeast of the Site. According to the driller's report,the well is <br /> screened from 200 to 56o fbg. The other four wells are not located within the approximate path <br /> of local groundwater flow. Details of the wells located within a 1/2 mile radius of the Site are <br /> summarized in Table 6. <br /> Given the significant depth interval between the impacts reported in Site wells and the deeper <br /> screened intervals for wells located within a 1/2 mile radius, the overall low magnitude of these <br /> impacts and the distance these wells are situated from the Site, it is unlikely that these wells are <br /> at risk from Site-related groundwater impacts. <br /> Furthermore, dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon plumes, especially those consisting <br /> primarily of less mobile constituents(primarily petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel and motor <br /> oil range), do not typically extend well beyond their source area and, according to findings from <br /> the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory(LLNL) plume study(Rice et, al., 1995) most <br /> plumes are less than 26o feet in length. <br /> Therefore, it is considered unlikely that petroleum hydrocarbon impacted groundwater, <br /> currently defined within a small area onsite, could have migrated a sufficient distance offsite to <br /> present any threat to a public supply well located nearly 2,000 feet from the Site and screened <br /> well below a depth that would be expected for shallow groundwater TPH impacts to have <br /> migrated vertically. <br /> 6.2 Surface Water <br /> The nearest surface water is the Stockton Diverting Canal,located approximately 1 mile north of <br /> the property, as indicted in Figure 9. However,based on the distance from the Site, the canal is <br /> unlikely to be impacted and is therefore not considered a potential sensitive receptor. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.