Laserfiche WebLink
7.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT <br /> A human health risk assessment was conducted using the RISCO risk assessment <br /> software. The RISCO is published by Groundwater Software.com,a software <br /> development company specializing in geosciences applications. The program has been <br /> (unofficially) approved by some regional boards of the State of California Water <br /> Resources Control Board to evaluate health risks at Leaking Underground Storage Tank <br /> (LUST)sites. The RISCO program consists of a series of linked workbooks using <br /> equations generally provided in screening guidelines promulgated by the SFRWQCB. <br /> These spreadsheets allow for the calculation of baseline human health risks based on <br /> user-provided inputs.The calculation incorporates site-specific data to identify source <br /> media, transport mechanisms, exposure pathways and potential receptors and to <br /> calculate baseline carcinogenic risk and noncancer toxic hazards relative to regulatory <br /> thresholds(i.e., 1 x 10-6 for excess cancer deaths and a Hazard Index of 1.o for noncancer <br /> toxic effects). <br /> Constituents of concern(COCs) at the Site were identified as TPH-d, MTBE, Benzene and <br /> 1,2-DCA.The exposure scenarios are limited to a worker(commercial or construction worker) <br /> potentially exposed to contaminated soil,groundwater and indoor air vapors(e.g.,the latter <br /> exposure would potentially occur in a building situated above areas where soil and groundwater <br /> impacts have been reported). Direct exposure to shallow non-potable groundwater is assumed <br /> to be an incomplete exposure pathway,and has therefore not been evaluated quantifiably. <br /> Based on the current depth to groundwater beneath the Site,the absence of any remaining <br /> vadose zone soil impacts beneath the Site following extensive soil removal actions, and the <br /> generally low volatility of constituents currently present in Site groundwater(primarily <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range)a soil gas survey was not deemed necessary at this <br /> time. Potential indoor air concentrations of(volatile) COCs were calculated using the Johnson <br /> &Ettinger(1991) fate and transport model. Available soil data were used to quantify risks; <br /> maximum (historic) reported concentrations were used as data inputs to calculate exposure <br /> point concentrations for soil and for potential indoor air vapors. Exposure point concentrations <br /> for potential indoor air vapors were determined based on fate and transport modeling using <br /> maximum reported soil and grab groundwater concentrations from borings collected post- <br /> excavation and the maximum of the last five quarterly monitoring results. Since the reported <br /> levels of volatile COCs in Site soils were approximately equal to or below laboratory detection <br /> limits, the fate and transport modeling associated with propagation of vapors from groundwater <br /> sources was used to determine potential indoor air concentrations of volatilized COCs. <br /> A summary of the potential human health risks calculated for commercial/industrial <br /> occupants exposed to COCs in indoor air is provided in Table 7 below, along with <br /> maximum groundwater concentrations over the last five quarters, and calculated <br /> potential indoor air levels for each COC. A summary of risks calculated for surface soil <br /> exposure is shown in Table 8. Copies of RISCO Model runs, including input and output <br /> data and assumptions,are included in Appendix F. The risks are calculated for a worker <br /> with a reasonable maximum exposure("RME") to Site contaminants. <br /> The calculated potential excess cancer risk associated with potential inhalation exposure <br /> to CDCs in indoor air was 3.28 x 10-9 —or approximately three in one billion-which, as <br /> noted above, is well below the typical threshold for acceptable excess cancer risk(i.e., 1 x <br /> 10-6, or one in a million). <br /> 10 <br />