My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
1645
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544495
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 10:55:38 AM
Creation date
5/28/2019 10:41:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0544495
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003688
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL RAILWAYS COMPANY - STOCKTON YARD
STREET_NUMBER
1645
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11910013
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1645 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
grab groundwater samples for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPH-g),TPH-d, BTEX <br /> constituents, and five oxygenates were all below reported laboratory limits(HETI 2001). <br /> August 28-29, 2000: HETI constructed three groundwater monitoring wells(MW-1, MW-2, <br /> and MW-3) to 50 fbg with 15 feet of screen (Figure 2). Soil samples were not collected for <br /> analysis from wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 due to the close proximity of previously installed <br /> borings B-1, B-4, and B-5, respectively. TPH-d was detected in groundwater samples collected <br /> from each of the three wells. Quarterly monitoring was initiated in September 2000 (HETI <br /> 2001), and continued through February 2002. The wells were dry during both the November <br /> tool and February 2002 monitoring events (HETI 2004). Groundwater data collected from <br /> these wells are included in Tables 1 and 3. These wells were subsequently destroyed in 2005 in <br /> preparation for Site excavation activities. <br /> August 20, 2001: HETI installed an additional groundwater monitoring well (MW-4) in the <br /> former diesel UST excavation (HETI 2004). <br /> June 2oo4: HETI advanced five additional soil borings (B-7 through B-11) to total depth of 50 <br /> fbg. All analytical results for TPH-g and BTEX constituents were below laboratory reporting <br /> limits. TPH-d was detected in soil samples at a maximum concentration of 4,300 mg/kg in the <br /> sample collected at 25 fbg from B-11. TPH-d was detected in two grab groundwater samples at a <br /> maximum concentration of 2,900 micrograms per liter(µg/L) in the sample collected from B-8 <br /> (HETI 2004). <br /> June 12-18, 2oo8: TRC completed six(6) onsite soil borings to groundwater and converted <br /> three (3) of the soil borings to groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5 through MW-7). Soil <br /> borings were completed to total depths ranging from 68 feet below grade (fbg) to 85 fbg <br /> depending upon soil and groundwater conditions. The maximum concentration of TPH-d <br /> reported in groundwater was 1,300 micrograms per liter(µg/L) in the grab groundwater sample <br /> collected from boring B-12/MW-5 (TRC, 2008). Monitoring wells were completed to a depth of <br /> 67 fbg based on lithologies observed during drilling. Twenty(20) feet of 0.020 inch slotted well <br /> screen was installed in each monitoring well. <br /> Groundwater MonitorinZ: Groundwater elevations and water quality have been monitored <br /> quarterly from September 2000 until May 20o9,and semi-annually through the third quarter <br /> 2010. Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 were sampled during the initial and first quarterly <br /> monitoring event. Subsequent attempts to gauge and sample these wells failed due to a lack of <br /> groundwater in the wells.These wells remained dry until their destruction in June 2005. <br /> Monitoring well MW-4 was never gauged nor sampled since,the well remained dry until its <br /> destruction in June 2005. <br /> 2.3.1 Summary of Remedial Actions <br /> Bohm Environmental Solutions(BES) prepared a Remedial Action Work Plan for the Site on <br /> April 16, 2005. The Work Plan determined remediation by excavation provided the most <br /> effective process for removing soil(hot spots) containing elevated levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. CLS Environmental Services submitted a Remedial Feasibility Evaluation as part <br /> of the Remedial Action Report (RAR) submitted on December 12, 2oo6. The Feasibility <br /> Evaluation also indicated that excavation was the most efficient clean-up method. Soil vapor <br /> extraction was not deemed feasible at the Site due to the compacted soil conditions present and <br /> the inability of diesel to readily volatilize. Microbial injection was considered a viable option. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.