ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- r r r ,f t r i Quarterly Report - Second Quarter 2002 CHEROKEE TRUCK STOP, ' 3535'East Cherokee Road, Stockton, California r r � I1.0. INTRODUCTION r At the request of Mr Ellis Cecchmi of Cecchim, `Cecchini and Giovannom, Advanced ~ r Ij GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this report for field work performed at 3535 East Cherokee Road,Stockton,California,during the second quarter of 2002 The scope of work included conducting a quarterly ground water monitoring event,waste disposal and preparation of this report } The site setting is illustrated in Figure 1 r Structures, monitoring well and soil boring locations are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 Background information was summarized In the AGE-prepared Problem Assessment Report,,dated 16 August 2001 At the request of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD),Cherokee Truck Stop quarterly ground water monitoring events are coordinated to occur concurrently with ground water monitoring activities at the adjacent Moore Truck Lines property(3400 Newton Road) 2.0. PROCEDURES Six ound water monitoring wells and two domestic wells were purged and sampled on 10 June � g p g P 2002 Field work was performed in accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB)and EHD guidelines for the Investigations ofunderground storage tank (UST) sites and sampling ground water monitoring wells, respectively 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION A Solmst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water relative to the tops of the well casings in six monitoring wells in the area of the former UST locations The ground water elevation in each well and ground water flow direction for the site were determined from the data collected (Table 1) - After measuring ground water depths, monitoring wells UST-1 through UST-4 and UST-6 were purged using a 2-inch Grundfos submersible purge pump Monitoring well UST-5 was purged using a new disposable plastic bailer Approximately 80 gallons of water were purged from UST-1 and approximately 6 5 to 11 gallons of water were removed from wells UST-2 through UST-6 (a minimum of three casing-water-volumes per well) Ground water was purged from near the top of the water column to remove water trapped within the unscreened interval of the well casings Temperature,pH and conductivity ofpurged water were measured at regular intervals during purging using an Oakton water analyzer The recorded field data and logs are included in Appendix A Purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon DOT-approved drums pending laboratory analysis IAdvanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc e 1 r y r f