Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> I I <br /> -.{,<+x;auk <br /> I 11 I; Ix 1 it ' <br /> ' Quarterly Report - Third Quarter 2004 <br /> i' • CHEROKEE TRUCK STOP ` <br /> 3535 East Cherokee Road, Stockton, California <br /> 1 If 1 <br /> 1 E <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION " <br /> At the request of Mr Ellis Cecchirii of Cecchini,, Cecchim, and Giovannom, Advanced <br /> GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this report of environmental activities performed at <br /> 3535 East Cherokee Road, Stockton California during the third quarter of 2004 The scope of work j <br /> included conducting a quarterly ground water monitoring event and preparation of this report The <br />'1 site setting is illustrated on Figure I ' Structures, monitoring wells, and soil boring locations are <br /> illustrated on Figure,2 Background information was summarized in the AGE-prepared Problem <br />' Assessment Report, dated 16 August 2001 <br /> ' 1 , <br /> ' ! I <br /> At the request of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD),Cherokee Truck- <br /> Stop <br /> ruck_Stop quarterly ground water monitoring events are coordinated to occur concurrently with ground r' <br />' water monitoring activities at the adjacent Moore Truck Lines property(3400 Newton Road) <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES <br />� . On 27 August 2004, six ground water monitoring wells and the"large"on-site domestic well were <br /> monitored and only five were purged and sampled, due to a seasonal low water table level Field <br /> work was performed in accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />' I (CVRWQCB) and EHD guidelines far the investigations of underground storage tank(UST) sites <br /> and sampling ground water momtoring wells, respectively <br /> 2 ,1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION <br /> On 27 August 2004, a'Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water i <br /> relative to the tops of`the well casings in six monitoring wells in the area of the foriner UST <br /> locations The ground water, elevation in wells UST-2 through UST-6 and-ground water flow <br /> r ' direction for theisite were determined from,the data collected (Table 1) <br /> After irieasunng ground water depths, monitoring wells UST-2 through UST-4 and UST-7 were <br /> r purged using a Waterra inertial pump and dedicated tubing Between 6 and 9 5 gallons of water were <br /> removed from the wells (a minimum of three casing-water volumes per well) Ground water was <br /> purged from near thelto 'ofthe water column to remove'water trapped within the unscreened interval " <br /> of the well casings ,Temperature,pH,and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular <br /> intervals during purging using an Oakton water analyzer 'There was not enough water in wells € <br /> UST-5 and UST-6 to purge or sample The recorded field data and logs are included in Appendix A , <br /> I Purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon Department of Transportation(DOT)-approved drums <br />' • pending proper disposal <br /> i Advanced GeoEnviranmental,lnc <br /> I I <br /> 6 <br />