Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> to enter into such an agreement is uncertain. <br /> Corrective Action: State in the text that inter-agency concurrence for such an <br /> agreement is uncertain. <br /> 64. Section 7.2.1.3 <br /> It is not clear why the ROD contains a description of the State's Border Zone Law. <br /> This requirement would not be triggered by the selection of the alternative which <br /> utilizes institutional controls since it is EPA's understanding that this requirement is <br /> already in place at DDRW-Tracy. This section did not appear in the FS for OU #1. <br /> This state requirement is not an ARAR for this remedial action. <br /> Corrective Action: If this section is included in response to public comment, then it <br /> should be moved to the responsiveness summary. <br /> 65. Section 7.2.2.3.1 <br /> Again the text evaluates long-term effectiveness based on an assumption that an <br /> interagency management agreement would be realized. <br /> Corrective Action: Revise text to indicate that interagency concurrence may not be <br /> feasible. <br /> 66. Section 7.2.2.3.2 <br /> The effectiveness of the monitoring program is not the correct focus for this section. <br /> Instead, the text should focus on the long-term effectiveness and protectiveness of <br /> human health and the environment of the alternative. <br /> Corrective Action: Modify the evaluation accordingly. <br /> 67. Section 7.2.2.6 <br /> The text states that "monitoring, deed restrictions, and well-drilling restrictions are <br /> easily implementable." What is the basis for this conclusion? The enforcement of <br /> such restrictions is problematic. <br /> Corrective Action: Revise the text to reflect the uncertainties associated with <br /> enforcing these restrictions given the entire time frame for this alternative. <br /> 68_ Section 7.2.2.6 <br /> The text indicates that an interagency agreement could be negotiated. How is this <br /> conclusion substantiated. <br /> Corrective Action: Either explain how it is known that such an agreement can be <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 16/40 <br />