My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. Water Quality Protection Standards <br /> The citation as listed [CRC (sic) Title 23, Chapter 5, Article 5, Sec. 2550.2] <br /> does not exist. Reference to this citation should be deleted or corrected. If <br /> Chapter 15, rather than Chapter 5, was the intended citation, then this is not <br /> an ARAR for the same reasons stated directly above. <br /> e. Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Water Code, Div 7 13000 et seq.§ <br /> This is not an ARAR. Federal and State MCLs constitute ARARs for cleanup <br /> standards. Moreover, Resolution 68-16 and the NPDES are discussed <br /> separately and cover issues concerning surface and groundwater quality. <br /> Reference to this citation should be deleted. <br /> f. Water Quality Control Plans, Water Code, Div 7 §§ 13140, 13240 <br /> This is not an ARAR. Specific numeric standards are not identified in the <br /> water quality control plans. Additionally, any discharge to groundwater <br /> would be subject to Resolution 68-16 or any discharge to surface waters <br /> would be subject to NPDES, provided that such requirements are more <br /> stringent. Reference to these plans should be deleted. <br /> g. State Anti-degradation Policy, Resolution 68-16 <br /> The numeric standard required by 68-16 must be specifically identified if <br /> this is to be considered an ARAR. <br /> h. Policies and Procedures for Investigation, Cleanup and Abatement of <br /> Discharges, Resolution 92-49 <br /> This is not an ARAR. Resolution 92-49 has not satisfied certain State <br /> procedural requirements enabling its promulgation. More specifically, <br /> California statute AB 3359 requires all policies adopted after June 1, 1992 to <br /> be approved by the Office of Administrative Law (AOL) in order to become <br /> effective. Resolution 92-49 was adopted on June 18, 1992 and is subject to <br /> AB 3359. However it has not yet been approved by AOL and therefore is not <br /> enforceable. Reference to 92-49 should be deleted. <br /> i. Inland Surface Water Plan, Resolution 91-33 <br /> The state should opine as to whether disposal into the stormwater pond (and <br /> the San Joaquin River), as described more fully in the comment section under <br /> the Clean Water Act (Table 10.2.1, page 5 of 5) would trigger Resolution 91-33 <br /> as an ARAR. <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 33/40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.