Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> j. Drinking Water Source Definition, Resolution 88-63 <br /> This is not an ARAR. In 1989, the AOC invalidated Resolution 88-63 because <br /> the State Board had failed to comply with the rulemaking requirements of the <br /> Administrative Procedures Act. However, sources of drinking water may be <br /> designated in the regional basin plan. <br /> k. San Joaquin County Well Regulations, County Ordinance 1862 <br /> This is not an ARAR. Local regulations do not constitute ARARs. However, <br /> DDRW-Tracy may select these regulations as performance standards. <br /> 1. Hazardous Waste Control Laws, 22 CCR Div. 4.5., Chapter 10 §6601 et seq. <br /> This is not an ARAR. 22 CCR §§66264.600 - 66264.603 dealing with <br /> miscellaneous units covers the groundwater treatment plant. <br /> m. Hazardous Materials Release Plans and Inventory Requirements, 19 CCR, <br /> Div. 4.5, Chapter 11 §66261 et seq. <br /> This is not an ARAR. Reporting requirements do not create substantive <br /> cleanup standards. <br /> Corrective Action: Incorporate appropriate changes to the ARARs Tables and the <br /> text of the ROD to reflect all the above comments. <br /> COMMENTS ON THE <br /> RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY <br /> 134. Introduction <br /> It would be helpful to the reader to have the decisions which are documented in this <br /> ROD reiterated in this section. It would also be useful to include that the decision to <br /> include an alternative mechanism to dispose of the treated groundwater has the joint <br /> support of the state and the EPA. <br /> Corrective Action: Reiterate the definition of OU #1, as modified by EPA <br /> comments, and the setting of cleanup standards for TCE, PCE and DCE. Include <br /> text stating that the state and EPA support the inclusion of disposal of treated <br /> groundwater to percolation ponds. <br /> 135. Page 2, Lines 1 through 3 <br /> The phrase "which DDRW-Tracy will not address" regarding public comments <br /> pertaining to areas outside of DDRW-Tracy's jurisdiction, could be interpreted <br /> 34/40 <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 <br />