Laserfiche WebLink
negatively by the reviewing public. Moreover, DDRW-Tracy should respond to all <br /> comments relative to environmental issues at the depot. <br /> Corrective Action: The sentence should be reworded. <br /> 136. Page 2, Lines 7 and 8 <br /> It is unclear how "this section" will "keep DDRW-Tracy . . . alert". <br /> Corrective Action: EPA suggests that this sentence be reworded. <br /> 137. Section 1.1 <br /> The text omits the fact that DCE is a part of this ROD. Further the text states that <br /> "OU #1 is considered for cleanup" which erroneously implies that this ROD may not <br /> be a "record of decision." <br /> Corrective Action: Include DCE in the text. Revise the text to state that OU #1 is to <br /> be cleaned up prior to remediation of other contamination to address contamination <br /> which poses a current greater threat to human health and the environment. <br /> 138. Section 1.2 <br /> Twice the text in this section mentions injection as the means to return the treated <br /> groundwater to the aquifer, but does not also mention use of ponds. <br /> Corrective Action: Revise the text to also include use of ponds. <br /> 139. Section 1.2 <br /> The text " . . . causes the contaminants, TCE and PCE, to volatilize" implies that TCE <br /> and PCE are the only contaminants. <br /> Corrective Action: Revise the text to state "causing all the contaminants, including <br /> the most prevalent, TCE and PCE, to volatilize." <br /> 140. Section 2.3 <br /> The text states, regarding the December 19, 1992 public meeting, that "several of the <br /> regulatory agencies involved in the program" were present. However, this text <br /> should be more specific. <br /> Corrective Action: State which regulatory agencies were represented at the meeting. <br /> 141. Section 2.5 <br /> The text omits the significant action of the mail-out of the proposed plan fact sheet <br /> 35/40 <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 <br />